What are your qualifications?

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m ({{Common objections}})
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This is the [[Logical fallacy|fallacy]] that if someone has not studied or been educated in a particular topic on a high enough level, then that person is not allowed to criticize that topic of interest at all.
+
This is the [[Logical fallacy|fallacy]] that if someone has not studied or been educated in a particular topic on a high enough level, then that person is not allowed to criticize that topic of interest at all. It is an [[Argument from authority|argument from authority]], except in reverse.
  
 
It is deemed a fallacy for the reason that information is legitimate or illegitimate without needing the person stating it to be an expert or even authoritative. If someone is an expert then they may know more on the subject, may be more likely to be correct or be more believable, but that doesn't discredit the information.
 
It is deemed a fallacy for the reason that information is legitimate or illegitimate without needing the person stating it to be an expert or even authoritative. If someone is an expert then they may know more on the subject, may be more likely to be correct or be more believable, but that doesn't discredit the information.
  
 +
{{Common objections}}
  
 
[[Category:Logical fallacies]]
 
[[Category:Logical fallacies]]

Revision as of 19:20, 24 December 2011

This is the fallacy that if someone has not studied or been educated in a particular topic on a high enough level, then that person is not allowed to criticize that topic of interest at all. It is an argument from authority, except in reverse.

It is deemed a fallacy for the reason that information is legitimate or illegitimate without needing the person stating it to be an expert or even authoritative. If someone is an expert then they may know more on the subject, may be more likely to be correct or be more believable, but that doesn't discredit the information.


v · d Common objections to atheism and counter-apologetics
Personal   Why are you trying to tear down other people's faith? · Why can't everyone just have their own beliefs? · What are your qualifications? · Atheists believe in nothing · You are a communist · Why do atheists inspire such hatred? · That's not my God
Religious   That's not in my Bible · They're not true Christians · You just want to sin · Atheists know there is a God · It takes more faith to disbelieve than it does to believe · God doesn't believe in atheists · Science is a faith · Atheism is a religion · Atheists worship materialism · Hypocrisy of celebrating religious holidays · Atheism is based on faith · Religious belief is beneficial
Science and logic   You can't prove God doesn't exist · Science can't touch god · God can't be defined · So you think we came from nothing / pondsoup / monkeys? · If God didn't create everything, who did? · That might be true for you, but its not true for me · Religion is another way of knowing · Apologetics and dinosaurs
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox