User talk:Zurahn
(Difference between revisions)
(→Sic) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I've [http://wiki.ironchariots.org/index.php?title=50_reasons_to_believe_in_God&diff=10028&oldid=10025 reverted your latest edit] to [[50 reasons to believe in God]] because those "[sic]"s I left in the article are actually errors. The ones I hid in HTML comments are just differences between British and American spelling. - [[User:Dcljr|dcljr]] 11:21, 10 December 2008 (CST) | I've [http://wiki.ironchariots.org/index.php?title=50_reasons_to_believe_in_God&diff=10028&oldid=10025 reverted your latest edit] to [[50 reasons to believe in God]] because those "[sic]"s I left in the article are actually errors. The ones I hid in HTML comments are just differences between British and American spelling. - [[User:Dcljr|dcljr]] 11:21, 10 December 2008 (CST) | ||
::Ah, ok; though, I didn't think "organise" was a British variant, such as "realise." Then again, I'm not British. --[[User:Zurahn|Zurahn]] | ::Ah, ok; though, I didn't think "organise" was a British variant, such as "realise." Then again, I'm not British. --[[User:Zurahn|Zurahn]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | I see that you reverted my changes to "[[50 reasons to believe in God]]", but you didn't supply a reason. I've voiced my opinion in the page's discussion section. Could you please contribute your views there? Also, thanks for the change in wording above ("On the other hand" to a semicolon. It reads much better now). 22:43, 4 May 2009 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:43, 4 May 2009
Welcome.
Sic
I've reverted your latest edit to 50 reasons to believe in God because those "[sic]"s I left in the article are actually errors. The ones I hid in HTML comments are just differences between British and American spelling. - dcljr 11:21, 10 December 2008 (CST)
- Ah, ok; though, I didn't think "organise" was a British variant, such as "realise." Then again, I'm not British. --Zurahn
I see that you reverted my changes to "50 reasons to believe in God", but you didn't supply a reason. I've voiced my opinion in the page's discussion section. Could you please contribute your views there? Also, thanks for the change in wording above ("On the other hand" to a semicolon. It reads much better now). 22:43, 4 May 2009 (CDT)
