User talk:Zurahn
(Difference between revisions)
(→Sic) |
(Whoops) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I see that you reverted my changes to "[[50 reasons to believe in God]]", but you didn't supply a reason. I've voiced my opinion in the page's discussion section. Could you please contribute your views there? Also, thanks for the change in wording above ("On the other hand" to a semicolon. It reads much better now). [[User:Mann jess|Mann jess]] 22:43, 4 May 2009 (CDT) | I see that you reverted my changes to "[[50 reasons to believe in God]]", but you didn't supply a reason. I've voiced my opinion in the page's discussion section. Could you please contribute your views there? Also, thanks for the change in wording above ("On the other hand" to a semicolon. It reads much better now). [[User:Mann jess|Mann jess]] 22:43, 4 May 2009 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::I can tell you why I didn't provide a reason: I had no idea I reverted it. I've really no idea how that happened, since I would have been editing the live page.--[[User:Zurahn|Zurahn]] 23:13, 4 May 2009 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 23:13, 4 May 2009
Welcome.
Sic
I've reverted your latest edit to 50 reasons to believe in God because those "[sic]"s I left in the article are actually errors. The ones I hid in HTML comments are just differences between British and American spelling. - dcljr 11:21, 10 December 2008 (CST)
- Ah, ok; though, I didn't think "organise" was a British variant, such as "realise." Then again, I'm not British. --Zurahn
I see that you reverted my changes to "50 reasons to believe in God", but you didn't supply a reason. I've voiced my opinion in the page's discussion section. Could you please contribute your views there? Also, thanks for the change in wording above ("On the other hand" to a semicolon. It reads much better now). Mann jess 22:43, 4 May 2009 (CDT)
- I can tell you why I didn't provide a reason: I had no idea I reverted it. I've really no idea how that happened, since I would have been editing the live page.--Zurahn 23:13, 4 May 2009 (CDT)
