User:Enshoku
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*"[[Hitler]] was an [[evil]] [[atheist]], you don't want to be a nazi do you?" | *"[[Hitler]] was an [[evil]] [[atheist]], you don't want to be a nazi do you?" | ||
| − | *The first objection to the | + | *The first objection to the statement is whether or not Hitler was an atheist, which tends to be an argument from ignorance, due to the fact that Hitler was a devout [[catholic]]. The second issue with the statement is that it makes a link between atheism and Nazism via an [[Enthymeme|enthymeme]]. |
[[User:Enshoku|Enshoku]] 21:41, 29 April 2008 (CDT) | [[User:Enshoku|Enshoku]] 21:41, 29 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
--------------------- | --------------------- | ||
| + | Added specifics on [[argument_from_personal_experience]] article. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *This argument is particularly common among certain branches of Christianity where things like possession and levitating have been reported. | ||
| + | [[User:Enshoku|Enshoku]] 12:40, 5 May 2008 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 11:40, 5 May 2008
Editing history:
Edited example on no true Scotsman page, it is now the original 1975 example.
- Scotsman A: "You know, laddie, no Scotsman puts sugar in his porridge."
- Scotsman B: "Is that so? I seem to recall my cousin Angus puts sugar in his porridge"
- Scotsman A: "Aye... but no true Scotsman puts sugar in his porridge."
Enshoku 21:18, 29 April 2008 (CDT)
Added example on Appeal_to_emotion page:
- The first objection to the statement is whether or not Hitler was an atheist, which tends to be an argument from ignorance, due to the fact that Hitler was a devout catholic. The second issue with the statement is that it makes a link between atheism and Nazism via an enthymeme.
Enshoku 21:41, 29 April 2008 (CDT)
Added specifics on argument_from_personal_experience article.
- This argument is particularly common among certain branches of Christianity where things like possession and levitating have been reported.
Enshoku 12:40, 5 May 2008 (CDT)
