Unspecified Evidence

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (fix link)
(Grammar, wikification)
Line 1: Line 1:
An argument supported by the claim that evidence exists, but where such evidence is not presented.
+
'''Unspecified evidence''' is an argument supported by the claim that [[evidence]] exists, but where such evidence is not presented.
  
This argument is stated as "there is a lot of proof, but I can't be bothered to show you" or "there is so much proof that if it is not obvious to you then you must be willfully ignorant of it."
+
This argument is stated as, "there is a lot of proof, but I can't be bothered to show you" or, "there is so much proof that if it is not obvious to you then you must be willfully ignorant of it."
  
In itself, withholding the evidence that would support a claim is not a fallacy. But expecting someone to accept that claim based on such unspecified evidence is an [[Argumentum ad verecundiam|appeal to authority]].
+
In itself, withholding the evidence that would support a claim is not a [[fallacy]], but expecting someone to accept that claim based on such unspecified evidence is an [[Argumentum ad verecundiam|appeal to authority]].

Revision as of 09:34, 1 October 2009

Unspecified evidence is an argument supported by the claim that evidence exists, but where such evidence is not presented.

This argument is stated as, "there is a lot of proof, but I can't be bothered to show you" or, "there is so much proof that if it is not obvious to you then you must be willfully ignorant of it."

In itself, withholding the evidence that would support a claim is not a fallacy, but expecting someone to accept that claim based on such unspecified evidence is an appeal to authority.

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox