Tu quoque

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(addl. wikif.)
(See also: Added hypocrisy)
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Tu quoque''' (Latin for "Thou, also") is an [[argument]] that asserts or implies that a certain position is false or should be disregarded because its proponent fails to act consistently in accordance with that position. It is an attempt to show that a criticism applies equally to the person making it, and, as such, can be considered an [[ad hominem]] argument, since it focuses on the opposite party itself, rather than their position.
+
'''Tu quoque''' is basically a fancy way of saying, "No, ''you'' shut up!"
 +
 
 +
A latin phrase meaning "Thou, also", this [[argument]] asserts or implies that a certain position is false or should be disregarded because its proponent fails to act consistently in accordance with that position. It is an attempt to show that a criticism applies equally to the person making it, and, as such, can be considered an [[ad hominem]] argument, since it focuses on the opposite party itself, rather than their position.
  
 
Examples of this kind of argument can be seem in the "[[Atheism is based on faith]]" and "[[Atheism is a religion]]" [[apologist]] attacks on [[atheism]].
 
Examples of this kind of argument can be seem in the "[[Atheism is based on faith]]" and "[[Atheism is a religion]]" [[apologist]] attacks on [[atheism]].
 +
 +
==See also==
 +
* [[Hypocrisy]]
 +
* [[Shut up, that's why]]
 +
 +
{{Logical fallacies}}
  
 
[[Category:Argumentation]]
 
[[Category:Argumentation]]
 
[[Category:Logical fallacies]]
 
[[Category:Logical fallacies]]

Revision as of 12:48, 13 June 2010

Tu quoque is basically a fancy way of saying, "No, you shut up!"

A latin phrase meaning "Thou, also", this argument asserts or implies that a certain position is false or should be disregarded because its proponent fails to act consistently in accordance with that position. It is an attempt to show that a criticism applies equally to the person making it, and, as such, can be considered an ad hominem argument, since it focuses on the opposite party itself, rather than their position.

Examples of this kind of argument can be seem in the "Atheism is based on faith" and "Atheism is a religion" apologist attacks on atheism.

See also


v · d Logical fallacies
v · d Formal fallacies
Propositional logic   Affirming a disjunct · Affirming the consequent · Argument from fallacy · False dilemma · Denying the antecedent
Quantificational logic   Existential fallacy · Illicit conversion · Proof by example · Quantifier shift
Syllogistic   Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise · Exclusive premises · Necessity · Four-term Fallacy · Illicit major · Illicit minor · Undistributed middle
v · d Faulty generalisations
General   Begging the question · Gambler's fallacy · Slippery slope · Equivocation · argumentum verbosium
Distribution fallacies   Fallacy of composition · Fallacy of division
Data mining   Cherry picking · Accident fallacy · Spotlight fallacy · Hasty generalization · Special pleading
Causation fallacies   Post hoc ergo propter hoc · Retrospective determinism · Suppressed correlative · Wrong direction
Ontological fallacies   Fallacy of reification · Pathetic fallacy · Loki's Wager
v · d False relevance
Appeals   Appeal to authority · Appeal to consequences · Appeal to emotion · Appeal to motive · Appeal to novelty · Appeal to tradition · Appeal to pity · Appeal to popularity · Appeal to poverty · Appeal to spite · Appeal to wealth · Sentimental fallacy · Argumentum ad baculum
Ad hominem   Ad hominem abusive · Reductio ad Hitlerum · Judgmental language · Straw man · Tu quoque · Poisoning the well
Genetic Fallacies   Genetic fallacy · Association fallacy · Appeal to tradition · Texas sharpshooter fallacy
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox