Theodicy

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(re-redo)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{religion-stub}}
 
{{religion-stub}}
  
A theodicy is theistic attempt to explain why evil exists in the world dispite the existance of God. Knowledge of theodistic arguments can help an atheist counter these arguments.
+
A '''theodicy''' is an attempt to defend [[God]]'s goodness in view of the existence of [[evil]]. They are common to monotheistic religions based on the Abrahamic tradition, namely Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, as these all suffer from the [[problem of evil]].
  
Theodicy is not found in all theistic beliefs, but is common to the three primary monotheistic religions (the Abrahamic traditions) of the western world. 
+
In short, the problem of evil occurs when specific attributes are ascribed to God:
  
The need for theodicy is based on a specific set of assumptions about the nature of god and the world.  In religions which do not formulate god(s) in the following mannor, theodicy will not be present;
+
# Omniscience (all-knowing)
 +
# Omnipotence (all-powerful)
 +
# Omnibenevolence (infinite goodness)
  
 +
Given these three attributes, God should know evil things will happen, have the power to prevent them, and the desire and will to prevent them. Since evil things happen nonetheless, it must be assumed that god lacks one of these three attributes.
  
1. God is omnibenevolent (God is completely good.)
+
A theodicy attempts to explain how God can retain these attributes despite the existence of evil.
2. God is omnissiant (God is all-knowing.)
+
3. God is omnipotent (God is all-powerful.)
+
4. Evil exists in the world. (Not generally up for debate.)
+
  
Do not assume these are the beliefs of all theists. Polytheism, for instance, would specifically disagree with point 3, and usually disagrees with points 1 and 2. Some polytheists may even point to theodicy as a reason to prefer polytheism over monotheism.
+
Theodicy is not found in all theistic beliefs, as not all theistic traditions ascribe the same attributes to God. Some polytheistic religions, for example, do not ascribe any god the quality of omnipotence. If a god does not have the power to prevent evil, then the dilemma is avoided in his case.
  
Two Common Theodicies
+
== Common Theodicies ==
  
 
St. Augustine's Theodicy: Blame it on the Fall from Eden
 
St. Augustine's Theodicy: Blame it on the Fall from Eden
-explication needed-
 
 
St. Irenaeus's Theodicy: Evil serves a purpose.  It will make us good people. -explication needed-
 
  
 +
St. Irenaeus's Theodicy: Evil serves a purpose.
  
  

Revision as of 02:22, 16 December 2010


A theodicy is an attempt to defend God's goodness in view of the existence of evil. They are common to monotheistic religions based on the Abrahamic tradition, namely Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, as these all suffer from the problem of evil.

In short, the problem of evil occurs when specific attributes are ascribed to God:

  1. Omniscience (all-knowing)
  2. Omnipotence (all-powerful)
  3. Omnibenevolence (infinite goodness)

Given these three attributes, God should know evil things will happen, have the power to prevent them, and the desire and will to prevent them. Since evil things happen nonetheless, it must be assumed that god lacks one of these three attributes.

A theodicy attempts to explain how God can retain these attributes despite the existence of evil.

Theodicy is not found in all theistic beliefs, as not all theistic traditions ascribe the same attributes to God. Some polytheistic religions, for example, do not ascribe any god the quality of omnipotence. If a god does not have the power to prevent evil, then the dilemma is avoided in his case.

Common Theodicies

St. Augustine's Theodicy: Blame it on the Fall from Eden

St. Irenaeus's Theodicy: Evil serves a purpose.


See also

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox