Theodicy

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Apologetic response)
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{religion-stub}}
 
{{religion-stub}}
  
A theodicy is theistic attempt to explain why evil exists in the world dispite the existance of God. Knowledge of theodistic arguments can help an atheist counter these arguments.
+
A '''theodicy''' is an attempt to defend [[God]]'s goodness in view of the existence of [[evil]]. They are common to monotheistic religions based on the Abrahamic tradition, namely Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, as these all suffer from the [[problem of evil]].
  
Theodicy is not found in all theistic beliefs, but is common to the three primary monotheistic religions (the Abrahamic traditions) of the western world. 
+
In short, the problem of evil occurs when specific attributes are ascribed to God:
  
The need for theodicy is based on a specific set of assumptions about the nature of god and the world.  In religions which do not formulate god(s) in the following mannor, theodicy will not be present;
+
# Omniscience (all-knowing)
 +
# Omnipotence (all-powerful)
 +
# Omnibenevolence (infinite goodness)
  
 +
Given these three attributes, God should know evil things will happen, have the power to prevent them, and the desire and will to prevent them. Since evil things happen nonetheless, it must be assumed that god lacks one of these three attributes.
  
1. God is omnibenevolent (God is completely good.)
+
A theodicy attempts to explain how God can retain these attributes despite the existence of evil.
2. God is omnissiant (God is all-knowing.)
+
3. God is omnipotent (God is all-powerful.)
+
4. Evil exists in the world. (Not generally up for debate.)
+
  
Do not assume these are the beliefs of all theists. Polytheism, for instance, would specifically disagree with point 3, and usually disagrees with points 1 and 2. Some polytheists may even point to theodicy as a reason to prefer polytheism over monotheism.
+
Theodicy is not found in all theistic beliefs, as not all theistic traditions ascribe the same attributes to God. Some polytheistic religions, for example, do not ascribe any god the quality of omnipotence. If a god does not have the power to prevent evil, then the dilemma is avoided in his case.
  
Two Common Theodicies
+
==Apologetic response==
 +
Looking at the bible we can ascertain that God is not Omniscient (all-knowing). This misconception of God being all-knowing, comes from the fact that there are prophecies in the bible. However in Jewish thought prophecy was not "for-speaking" but "forth-speaking." It is the idea that God is declaring to the prophets something he will do in the future. Prophecies do not substantiate the claim that God has foreknowledge. Being far wiser than us, he may be able to predict what may happen (just like a supercomputer does today) but it is never cut into stone.
  
St. Augustine's Theodicy: Blame it on the Fall from Eden
+
== Common Theodicies ==
-explication needed-
+
  
St. Irenaeus's Theodicy: Evil serves a purpose.  It will make us good people. -explication needed-
+
St. Augustine's Theodicy: Blame it on the Fall from Eden
  
 +
St. Irenaeus's Theodicy: Evil serves a purpose.
  
  

Revision as of 13:33, 3 January 2012


A theodicy is an attempt to defend God's goodness in view of the existence of evil. They are common to monotheistic religions based on the Abrahamic tradition, namely Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, as these all suffer from the problem of evil.

In short, the problem of evil occurs when specific attributes are ascribed to God:

  1. Omniscience (all-knowing)
  2. Omnipotence (all-powerful)
  3. Omnibenevolence (infinite goodness)

Given these three attributes, God should know evil things will happen, have the power to prevent them, and the desire and will to prevent them. Since evil things happen nonetheless, it must be assumed that god lacks one of these three attributes.

A theodicy attempts to explain how God can retain these attributes despite the existence of evil.

Theodicy is not found in all theistic beliefs, as not all theistic traditions ascribe the same attributes to God. Some polytheistic religions, for example, do not ascribe any god the quality of omnipotence. If a god does not have the power to prevent evil, then the dilemma is avoided in his case.

Apologetic response

Looking at the bible we can ascertain that God is not Omniscient (all-knowing). This misconception of God being all-knowing, comes from the fact that there are prophecies in the bible. However in Jewish thought prophecy was not "for-speaking" but "forth-speaking." It is the idea that God is declaring to the prophets something he will do in the future. Prophecies do not substantiate the claim that God has foreknowledge. Being far wiser than us, he may be able to predict what may happen (just like a supercomputer does today) but it is never cut into stone.

Common Theodicies

St. Augustine's Theodicy: Blame it on the Fall from Eden

St. Irenaeus's Theodicy: Evil serves a purpose.


See also

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox