Tautology

From Iron Chariots Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
("Natural selection is a tautology": straw man?)
m
 
Line 16: Line 16:
 
"Those who survive, survive" is a tautology because there is no condition under which it could possibly be false.
 
"Those who survive, survive" is a tautology because there is no condition under which it could possibly be false.
  
It can be argued that "Natural selection" is neither synonymous with "Survival of the fittest", nor is it a single statement; treating it as either could be a [[straw man]].
+
It can be argued that "Natural selection" is neither defined as "survival of the fittest", nor is it a single statement; treating it as either could be a [[straw man]].
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==

Latest revision as of 09:46, 15 September 2008

A tautology is a logical statement which, by its very structure, must be true. For example:

A ∨ ¬A (A or not A)

In this example, A represents a statement, such as "God exists", "my shirt is white", or "all rabbits are green". But no matter what value we assign to A, the statement above is true:

Either God exists, or God does not exist.
Either my shirt is white, or my shirt is not white.
Either all rabbits are green, or else it is not the case that all rabbits are green.

"Natural selection is a tautology"

Creationists often argue that natural selection is a tautology:

  1. "Natural selection" is defined as "survival of the fittest".
  2. Those individuals in a population who survive are defined to be the fittest.
  3. Therefore, "survival of the fittest" means "survival of those who survive" or "those who survive, survive".

"Those who survive, survive" is a tautology because there is no condition under which it could possibly be false.

It can be argued that "Natural selection" is neither defined as "survival of the fittest", nor is it a single statement; treating it as either could be a straw man.

See also

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox