Talk:You are a communist

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I vote to delete this page. It seems like a special case of [[Argumentum ad hominem]]. --[[User:Arensb|Arensb]] 20:46, 29 December 2009 (CST)
 
I vote to delete this page. It seems like a special case of [[Argumentum ad hominem]]. --[[User:Arensb|Arensb]] 20:46, 29 December 2009 (CST)
 
:I dunno. I agree that it is an ad hominem, but the supposed "link between atheism and communism", or that "communism is atheism in practice", comes up so often that I think it does justify its own page. I will say that I think it should be worded and laid out allot better than it currently is.--[[User:Murphy|Murphy]] 23:29, 29 December 2009 (CST)
 
:I dunno. I agree that it is an ad hominem, but the supposed "link between atheism and communism", or that "communism is atheism in practice", comes up so often that I think it does justify its own page. I will say that I think it should be worded and laid out allot better than it currently is.--[[User:Murphy|Murphy]] 23:29, 29 December 2009 (CST)
 +
::Popularity doesn't mean there's a lot to say about it. If there's a "stub-worthy" amount to say about a certain special case, we could create a sub-heading "Special Cases" or "Examples" under [[Argumentum ad hominem]], and then if some day that section (or any single special case) grows sufficiently to justify a separate page, separate it at that point. I'd vote to delete --[[User:Jaban|Jaban]] 12:40, 30 December 2009 (CST)

Revision as of 12:40, 30 December 2009

I vote to delete this page. It seems like a special case of Argumentum ad hominem. --Arensb 20:46, 29 December 2009 (CST)

I dunno. I agree that it is an ad hominem, but the supposed "link between atheism and communism", or that "communism is atheism in practice", comes up so often that I think it does justify its own page. I will say that I think it should be worded and laid out allot better than it currently is.--Murphy 23:29, 29 December 2009 (CST)
Popularity doesn't mean there's a lot to say about it. If there's a "stub-worthy" amount to say about a certain special case, we could create a sub-heading "Special Cases" or "Examples" under Argumentum ad hominem, and then if some day that section (or any single special case) grows sufficiently to justify a separate page, separate it at that point. I'd vote to delete --Jaban 12:40, 30 December 2009 (CST)
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox