Talk:Tides come in, tides go out. You can't explain that.
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| − | no it was with richard dawkins. the david silverman interview was one of the "other encounters" that i mentioned. | + | :no it was with richard dawkins. the david silverman interview was one of the "other encounters" that i mentioned. |
| − | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2FARDDcdFaQ | + | :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2FARDDcdFaQ |
| − | 0:48 | + | :0:48 |
| − | and ive been encountering this more and more over the past few years. unless the meme status kills the argument, in which case it would stand as a satirical argument against the god of the gaps (like epilepsy), it will always be relevant. | + | :and ive been encountering this more and more over the past few years. unless the meme status kills the argument, in which case it would stand as a satirical argument against the god of the gaps (like epilepsy), it will always be relevant. |
| − | --[[User:Conor147|Conor147]] 20:53, 4 March 2011 (CST) | + | :--[[User:Conor147|Conor147]] 20:53, 4 March 2011 (CST) |
| + | |||
| + | ::I think the point is that it's not an official apologetic.. just something he came up with off the cuff. It's fine as an example of god-of-the-gaps. This wiki would be huge if we had a separate page for every random comment someone made on the air. | ||
| + | ::[[User:Jt|jt]] 06:18, 5 March 2011 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 07:18, 5 March 2011
An error, and a call for deletion
First of all, the interview was with David Silverman, not Richard Dawkins.
Secondly, this seems like a transient topic, not something of lasting interest. I suggest moving the content of this page to Argument from ignorance. --Arensb 17:23, 4 March 2011 (CST)
- no it was with richard dawkins. the david silverman interview was one of the "other encounters" that i mentioned.
- 0:48
- and ive been encountering this more and more over the past few years. unless the meme status kills the argument, in which case it would stand as a satirical argument against the god of the gaps (like epilepsy), it will always be relevant.
- --Conor147 20:53, 4 March 2011 (CST)
- I think the point is that it's not an official apologetic.. just something he came up with off the cuff. It's fine as an example of god-of-the-gaps. This wiki would be huge if we had a separate page for every random comment someone made on the air.
- jt 06:18, 5 March 2011 (CST)
