Talk:Tides come in, tides go out. You can't explain that.
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Secondly, this seems like a transient topic, not something of lasting interest. I suggest moving the content of this page to [[Argument from ignorance]]. --[[User:Arensb|Arensb]] 17:23, 4 March 2011 (CST) | Secondly, this seems like a transient topic, not something of lasting interest. I suggest moving the content of this page to [[Argument from ignorance]]. --[[User:Arensb|Arensb]] 17:23, 4 March 2011 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
no it was with richard dawkins. the david silverman interview was one of the "other encounters" that i mentioned. | no it was with richard dawkins. the david silverman interview was one of the "other encounters" that i mentioned. | ||
| Line 12: | Line 14: | ||
and ive been encountering this more and more over the past few years. unless the meme status kills the argument, in which case it would stand as a satirical argument against the god of the gaps (like epilepsy), it will always be relevant. | and ive been encountering this more and more over the past few years. unless the meme status kills the argument, in which case it would stand as a satirical argument against the god of the gaps (like epilepsy), it will always be relevant. | ||
| + | --[[User:Conor147|Conor147]] 20:53, 4 March 2011 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 21:53, 4 March 2011
An error, and a call for deletion
First of all, the interview was with David Silverman, not Richard Dawkins.
Secondly, this seems like a transient topic, not something of lasting interest. I suggest moving the content of this page to Argument from ignorance. --Arensb 17:23, 4 March 2011 (CST)
no it was with richard dawkins. the david silverman interview was one of the "other encounters" that i mentioned.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2FARDDcdFaQ
0:48
and ive been encountering this more and more over the past few years. unless the meme status kills the argument, in which case it would stand as a satirical argument against the god of the gaps (like epilepsy), it will always be relevant. --Conor147 20:53, 4 March 2011 (CST)
