Talk:The Church of the Latter-Day Dude

From Iron Chariots Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
:Perhaps you have the mercy to explain why you claim this to be a satirical religion, when it is not? [[User:Arno Matthias|Arno Matthias]] 15:03, 9 December 2011 (CST)
 
:Perhaps you have the mercy to explain why you claim this to be a satirical religion, when it is not? [[User:Arno Matthias|Arno Matthias]] 15:03, 9 December 2011 (CST)
 
::Well for starters, it's a religion based on a freaking comedy movie which is explicit fiction.  If you claim that it's not a satirical religion then explain it to me in a way that doesn't also change the categorization of Pastafarianism.  --[[User:Kazim|Kazim]] 15:21, 9 December 2011 (CST)
 
::Well for starters, it's a religion based on a freaking comedy movie which is explicit fiction.  If you claim that it's not a satirical religion then explain it to me in a way that doesn't also change the categorization of Pastafarianism.  --[[User:Kazim|Kazim]] 15:21, 9 December 2011 (CST)
 +
:::Why am I responsible for filling your gaps of knowledge? Do your own research! Well, allright then: although the movie has a lot of funny moments, the religion is based not on them, but on the philosophy oh the Dude, which is not funny or meant to be funny. This religion was invented to provide real, serious guidance to its followers. The FSM on the other was invented in an act of self-defence, when Henderson's children were in danger of being taught ID. This religion was invented (exactly like Russell's teapot) to highlight the difference between knowledge and faith. [[User:Arno Matthias|Arno Matthias]] 08:31, 10 December 2011 (CST)

Latest revision as of 09:31, 10 December 2011

Arno, I'm gonna make this real simple. If you try to revert the category again you'll be banned. --Kazim 10:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)

Perhaps you have the mercy to explain why you claim this to be a satirical religion, when it is not? Arno Matthias 15:03, 9 December 2011 (CST)
Well for starters, it's a religion based on a freaking comedy movie which is explicit fiction. If you claim that it's not a satirical religion then explain it to me in a way that doesn't also change the categorization of Pastafarianism. --Kazim 15:21, 9 December 2011 (CST)
Why am I responsible for filling your gaps of knowledge? Do your own research! Well, allright then: although the movie has a lot of funny moments, the religion is based not on them, but on the philosophy oh the Dude, which is not funny or meant to be funny. This religion was invented to provide real, serious guidance to its followers. The FSM on the other was invented in an act of self-defence, when Henderson's children were in danger of being taught ID. This religion was invented (exactly like Russell's teapot) to highlight the difference between knowledge and faith. Arno Matthias 08:31, 10 December 2011 (CST)
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox