Talk:Shifting the burden of proof

From Iron Chariots Wiki
Revision as of 17:20, 6 October 2010 by Rolf.z (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

on 7 January 2009 was this sentence deleted: "However, if a strong atheist makes the positive claim that no gods exist, then he or she has the burden of proving this claim. "


and isn´t "A theist is someone who claims that there is a god." a bit incorrect?

I would propose something like the following:

"A (gnostic) theist who claims that there is a god has the burden of proof. An (gnostic) atheist who claims that there is no god has the burden of proof too. While the Agnostic theist/atheist would not claim anything in the first place, so they don´t have the burden of proof in a discussion"

But maybe I am just missing the point here, because I don´t understand what the "positive claim" means??? (I am german and basicly only understand the word positive and claim but not the combination)

Personal tools
wiki navigation