Talk:Science
From Iron Chariots Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
| (One intermediate revision by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'd like to add a few more apologetic claims, e.g., 1) science presupposes (methodological) naturalism, and 2) a lot of anti-science claims are plain old ignorance. Each of these claims deserves a separate response. What's the best way to format these? | I'd like to add a few more apologetic claims, e.g., 1) science presupposes (methodological) naturalism, and 2) a lot of anti-science claims are plain old ignorance. Each of these claims deserves a separate response. What's the best way to format these? | ||
--[[User:Arensb|Arensb]] 15:11, 22 July 2006 (MST) | --[[User:Arensb|Arensb]] 15:11, 22 July 2006 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : I think you should check the [[America is a Christian nation]] page for an example of many arguments and responses on one page. We had some discussion about this and decided the page format should be: | ||
| + | :# A very concise introduction above the table of contents | ||
| + | :# A list of arguments under "Apologetics". | ||
| + | :# Detailed responses to each argument under "Counter-Apologetics" | ||
| + | :# More detailed article at the end, if necessary. | ||
| + | : We hadn't finalized this as '''the''' correct format, but it was the last version to come out of our discussion. --[[User:Kazim|Kazim]] 21:08, 22 July 2006 (MST) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:23, 22 July 2006
I'd like to add a few more apologetic claims, e.g., 1) science presupposes (methodological) naturalism, and 2) a lot of anti-science claims are plain old ignorance. Each of these claims deserves a separate response. What's the best way to format these? --Arensb 15:11, 22 July 2006 (MST)
- I think you should check the America is a Christian nation page for an example of many arguments and responses on one page. We had some discussion about this and decided the page format should be:
- A very concise introduction above the table of contents
- A list of arguments under "Apologetics".
- Detailed responses to each argument under "Counter-Apologetics"
- More detailed article at the end, if necessary.
- We hadn't finalized this as the correct format, but it was the last version to come out of our discussion. --Kazim 21:08, 22 July 2006 (MST)
