Talk:Ray Comfort

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Google)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
==Google==
 
==Google==
 
This article and the RationalWiki article on [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ray_Comfort Ray Comfort] are both on the first page of Google.  Congratulations!  Perhaps we need to make the two articles more different from each other as readers will click on both links. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 04:24, 29 September 2011 (CDT)
 
This article and the RationalWiki article on [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ray_Comfort Ray Comfort] are both on the first page of Google.  Congratulations!  Perhaps we need to make the two articles more different from each other as readers will click on both links. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 04:24, 29 September 2011 (CDT)
 +
 +
:Point taken. This site takes more of a one-sided view. Of course, there parts that are too big that both sites must address. But this site should focus more on deconstructing his arguments, but RW should be a bit briefer. However, I think that RW should keep the commentary on Comfort's multiple debates. I think RW should be very critical on parts where Comfort bashes science and evolution, whereas IronChariots can do that too but may focus more on Ray's arguments for God. Sound good? [[User:Feredir28|Wolf]] 15:28, 30 September 2011 (CDT)

Revision as of 15:28, 30 September 2011

Anyone mind if I started doing some critiques of Ray's books? Jwissick 23:40, 18 March 2010 (CDT)

Critiques of Ray's books are very much appreciated. Proxima Centauri 04:24, 29 September 2011 (CDT)

Google

This article and the RationalWiki article on Ray Comfort are both on the first page of Google. Congratulations! Perhaps we need to make the two articles more different from each other as readers will click on both links. Proxima Centauri 04:24, 29 September 2011 (CDT)

Point taken. This site takes more of a one-sided view. Of course, there parts that are too big that both sites must address. But this site should focus more on deconstructing his arguments, but RW should be a bit briefer. However, I think that RW should keep the commentary on Comfort's multiple debates. I think RW should be very critical on parts where Comfort bashes science and evolution, whereas IronChariots can do that too but may focus more on Ray's arguments for God. Sound good? Wolf 15:28, 30 September 2011 (CDT)
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox