Image for Page
I was thinking that the following might be a distant possibility for the image to represent this page. It has a Creative Commons license as long as the work is Attributed and there are no derivative works. Maybe it is not as serious as it should be. I'll let you decide.
I guess the alternative. Is the guy with 5 girls in bikinis. (Also, Creative Commons) http://flickr.com/photos/2rokbotoy/157483144/
Are these pictures out of bounds? Micah 19:55, 21 August 2006 (MST)
I vote for Vader and the Lea-ets. It could only be better if the Vader character were replaced with Jaba the Hut. I see no problem with it, but I'll leave it to the admins to decide on the appropriateness of the image. But all else being equal I'd say yes.
--L1soul 20:17, 21 August 2006 (MST)
- Looks to me like somebody's buying into the Abrahamic religions' polygyny bias. Shouldn't there be one of a number of men around one woman as well, and/or a single picture of a balanced group arrangement? --John Owens 04:19, 22 February 2007 (CST)
The section on Mormon polygamy on this site seems exceedingly apologetic. While I am new to this site, I thought from what I read on the main page that this site is for opposing apologetics. I will try to make a couple of changes here, and see how they are received. -Measure 17:23, 31 October 2009 (CDT)