Talk:Natural-law argument

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Talk:The existence of laws implies a law-giver moved to Talk:Natural-law argument: Broader and more correct terminology, based on reading Bertrand Russell)

Revision as of 16:31, 11 November 2006

I don't think this belongs in "morality arguments". It is about natural laws, not moral laws. --Kazim 14:54, 16 August 2006 (MST)

The existence of physical/natural laws requiring a law-giver should probably not simply be 'category:cosmological arguments' (first cause) as it's more directly a restatement of the anthropic principle (fine tuning). I suppose we need another article that addresses this same claim with regard to moral laws. Sans Deity 15:22, 16 August 2006 (MST)

Personal tools
wiki navigation