Talk:Moral argument

From Iron Chariots Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Arguments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arguments on IronChariots. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.


This page has been rated as A-Class on the project's quality scale.


This page has been rated as High importance on the project's importance scale.


Under the header "Arguments against the first premise," the arguments given contain several references to the "second premise". Seems either the header or the text need to be changed to agree; maybe the premises got swapped and someone didn't finish updating the text? I can't tell exactly which one each argument is supposed to refer to so I'm not changing it myself. fishbulb 23:23, 19 June 2008 (CDT)

Copy-and-paste jobs

I have removed two whole sections of this article that were copied from a website with a non-compatible copyright policy (as far as I could tell). If you want to refer to these arguments, summarize and paraphrase, but don't just copy and paste them here. - dcljr 15:04, 11 April 2010 (CDT)

Equivocation fallacy

There are multiple moral arguments:

  • No individual can be moral without believing in God. (Empirically false.)
  • No individual can be moral without the existence of God.
  • My preferred religion causes people to be more moral than others.
  • No moral theory is complete, correct, and consistent unless it is based on a deity.
Personal tools
wiki navigation