Talk:James Patrick Holding
From Iron Chariots Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
BronzeDome (Talk | contribs) |
BronzeDome (Talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Is there any real point to this page? And what about the rest of the [[Special:Lonelypages|Orphaned pages]]? --[[User:BronzeDome|BronzeDome]] 01:49, 27 February 2012 (CST) | Is there any real point to this page? And what about the rest of the [[Special:Lonelypages|Orphaned pages]]? --[[User:BronzeDome|BronzeDome]] 01:49, 27 February 2012 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Never heard of him, either. What do you think about a "list of apologists" page, categorized by religion? We could then remove pages for individual apologists that aren't any more useful to us than their wikipedia entries (JP Holding being a perfect example) and include a blurb at the top of the "list" page that contributors familiar with a given apologist's unique and/or most personally-used arguments are welcome to create a page for the apologist that links to the pages that refute those arguments. [[User:Jdog|Jdog]] 05:32, 27 February 2012 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I feel it hard for me to say, but I am open to the idea, and if you're willing to start such a page, that is write the blurb, I am most willing to move potential articles into it. (My approach to this is simply based on the Orphaned Pages list, which strikes me as an invitation to do some "weeding".) --[[User:BronzeDome|BronzeDome]] 12:36, 28 February 2012 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:36, 28 February 2012
I've changed "famous" to "well-known", though quite frankly I've never heard of him. BronzeDome 06:14, 18 October 2011 (CDT)
Is there any real point to this page? And what about the rest of the Orphaned pages? --BronzeDome 01:49, 27 February 2012 (CST)
- Never heard of him, either. What do you think about a "list of apologists" page, categorized by religion? We could then remove pages for individual apologists that aren't any more useful to us than their wikipedia entries (JP Holding being a perfect example) and include a blurb at the top of the "list" page that contributors familiar with a given apologist's unique and/or most personally-used arguments are welcome to create a page for the apologist that links to the pages that refute those arguments. Jdog 05:32, 27 February 2012 (CST)
- I feel it hard for me to say, but I am open to the idea, and if you're willing to start such a page, that is write the blurb, I am most willing to move potential articles into it. (My approach to this is simply based on the Orphaned Pages list, which strikes me as an invitation to do some "weeding".) --BronzeDome 12:36, 28 February 2012 (CST)
