Talk:Euthyphro dilemma
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
--[[User:Kazim|Kazim]] 17:39, 13 August 2006 (MST) | --[[User:Kazim|Kazim]] 17:39, 13 August 2006 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Yeah, that was my attempt at rationalizing what the "external force" is from which God learns what is and isn't good. I agree that it doesn't really fit in well here, so feel free to move it (or delete it, if you want to obliterate my deathless prose :-) ). | ||
| + | : Also, I have no idea what the difference is between "ethics" and "morality". I've added these to the "wanted pages" page, in hopes that someone will define them. | ||
| + | : --[[User:Arensb|Arensb]] 20:41, 26 August 2006 (MST) | ||
Revision as of 22:41, 26 August 2006
I don't see the section on game theory as directly related to the Euthyphro dilemma. It is a useful jumping off point to talk about secular morality, so perhaps a new article on that subject should be started and the game theory section moved there.
Question: should there be two separate articles on "morality" and "secular morality"? Another question: are "morality" and "ethics" the same subject, or do they require different articles?
--Kazim 17:39, 13 August 2006 (MST)
- Yeah, that was my attempt at rationalizing what the "external force" is from which God learns what is and isn't good. I agree that it doesn't really fit in well here, so feel free to move it (or delete it, if you want to obliterate my deathless prose :-) ).
- Also, I have no idea what the difference is between "ethics" and "morality". I've added these to the "wanted pages" page, in hopes that someone will define them.
- --Arensb 20:41, 26 August 2006 (MST)
