Talk:Big Daddy? (Chick tract)

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Including more pictures?)
Line 22: Line 22:
 
There's another option available to you, also - click the protect tab. Only sysops will be allowed to edit the page and it posts a warning on the edit screen...which should be enough to keep us from stepping on each other's toes. Just remove the protect setting when you're done and it'll be back to normal.[[User:Sans Deity|Sans Deity]] 14:32, 19 August 2006 (MST)
 
There's another option available to you, also - click the protect tab. Only sysops will be allowed to edit the page and it posts a warning on the edit screen...which should be enough to keep us from stepping on each other's toes. Just remove the protect setting when you're done and it'll be back to normal.[[User:Sans Deity|Sans Deity]] 14:32, 19 August 2006 (MST)
 
----
 
----
 +
 +
== Including more pictures? ==
 +
 +
As Jack Chick  is drowning the world in these little nuggets would it be possible to include more panels rather than transcribing.
 +
Any suggestions how  we can check up on the legality of that (and whether it's actually a worthwhile contribution to the page.)

Revision as of 11:23, 7 November 2008

Panel 7's footnote - "It has never been against the law to teach creationism in public schools." There's another red herring here...a bit of misdirection. The footnote is true, it's never been against the law to teach creationism...provided you teach it in a comparative religions class (or similar), and not as science or fact. You're correct to point out that the student is justified in expressing his religious opinion - though I'd add that the primary justification for this because he was asked to do so.

Going through the various rulings on the subject we see a clearer picture (all rulings affect public schools only):

  • Epperson v. Arkansas (Supreme)
    • Schools cannot ban evolution
  • Edwards v. Aguillard (Supreme)
    • Schools cannot require equal time for creationism
    • (Note that this is probably the case you meant to cite as it specifically targets "equal time" issues)
  • McLean v Arkansas (District)
    • Creation science is religious dogma (unchangeable with new evidence) which means it's not science
    • As it's not science, it can't be taught as fact and "equal time" is not allowed
  • Webster v. New Lennox School District (7th Circuit)
    • Teachers can't take it upon themselves to teach creationism
    • Doing so is a violation of the 1st amendment, just as if it had been ordered by the school
    • This is the key case that points out the critical flaw in the footnote. If creationism is taught in science class, by a teacher, it's illegal.

You can use this or ignore it, I'll probably put together a quickie article on creationism in the public schools, based on these and other items - though I have no idea how quickly I'll get to that. Sans Deity 23:14, 18 August 2006 (MST)


I created and added a template to this page, let me know what you think. Mediawiki is pretty good about handling edit merges, but as the wiki community grows, it seems like adding a quick warning about editing a work in progress seems like a good idea.

There's another option available to you, also - click the protect tab. Only sysops will be allowed to edit the page and it posts a warning on the edit screen...which should be enough to keep us from stepping on each other's toes. Just remove the protect setting when you're done and it'll be back to normal.Sans Deity 14:32, 19 August 2006 (MST)


Including more pictures?

As Jack Chick is drowning the world in these little nuggets would it be possible to include more panels rather than transcribing. Any suggestions how we can check up on the legality of that (and whether it's actually a worthwhile contribution to the page.)

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox