Talk:Big Bang

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(Use of "theory" in the article)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I reverted to the previous version because the information about the early universe was simply a duplicate of material later in the same article.  [[User:Kazim|Kazim]] 20:32, 14 December 2006 (CST)
 
I reverted to the previous version because the information about the early universe was simply a duplicate of material later in the same article.  [[User:Kazim|Kazim]] 20:32, 14 December 2006 (CST)
 +
 +
The word "theory" seems to be used laxly throughout the article.  I have the concern of conflating the colloquialism with the scientific meaning.  It is however difficult to avoid given the limited diction available for "plausible but unsupported explanation"--[[User:Zurahn|Zurahn]] 21:50, 17 June 2009 (CDT)

Revision as of 21:50, 17 June 2009

I reverted to the previous version because the information about the early universe was simply a duplicate of material later in the same article. Kazim 20:32, 14 December 2006 (CST)

The word "theory" seems to be used laxly throughout the article. I have the concern of conflating the colloquialism with the scientific meaning. It is however difficult to avoid given the limited diction available for "plausible but unsupported explanation"--Zurahn 21:50, 17 June 2009 (CDT)

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox