Talk:Bible

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Books of the Bible appears twice: Consarn it, I always forget to sign!)
(Books of the Bible appears twice)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
Now that we have this nifty template on the side of the page, isn't it redundant to also list the books of the Bible within the body of the article? --[[User:Kazim|Kazim]] 11:26, 27 February 2007 (CST)
 
Now that we have this nifty template on the side of the page, isn't it redundant to also list the books of the Bible within the body of the article? --[[User:Kazim|Kazim]] 11:26, 27 February 2007 (CST)
 +
 +
: Probably. Done. If anyone disagrees, you know how to revert. --[[User:Arensb|Arensb]] 10:53, 28 February 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 11:53, 28 February 2007

Should there be a naming scheme for the pages discussing specific books of the Bible? Right now, they're just named "Genesis", "Exodus", "Job", and so forth. But Revelation is about the experience, not the book.

In keeping with the "Wikipedia's been at this a long time" guideline, I suggest renaming Genesis as "Genesis (Bible)" or "Genesis (book of the Bible)", and so forth.

Anyone for? Anyone against? Anyone got any questions? Anyone want a mint? --Arensb 11:14, 2 August 2006 (MST)

Agreed, that seems to be the best solution.Sans Deity 11:27, 2 August 2006 (MST)

Books of the Bible appears twice

Now that we have this nifty template on the side of the page, isn't it redundant to also list the books of the Bible within the body of the article? --Kazim 11:26, 27 February 2007 (CST)

Probably. Done. If anyone disagrees, you know how to revert. --Arensb 10:53, 28 February 2007 (CST)
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox