Talk:Argument from trees

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(vote for deletion)
Line 7: Line 7:
--[[User:Jaban|Jaban]] 03:26, 15 August 2009 (CDT)
--[[User:Jaban|Jaban]] 03:26, 15 August 2009 (CDT)
::I vote for a redirect to [[argument from design]] --[[User:Zurahn|Zurahn]] 12:23, 15 August 2009 (CDT)

Revision as of 12:23, 15 August 2009

Delete this article

"Wednesday exists, therefore sneezing is heavier than purple."

There is no such thing as the argument from trees. If we allow an unsupported statement to be called an argument, the above is the Argument from Wednesday, and another argument exists for every noun. IMO, this article is pointless and should be deleted.

Though if anyone really wants to, we could have an article on people who just make a statement but don't offer any evidence or arguments to support it, because they are really just trying to confirm to themselves or their group that they believe it, not actually convince you of its correctness. *shrug*

--Jaban 03:26, 15 August 2009 (CDT)

I vote for a redirect to argument from design --Zurahn 12:23, 15 August 2009 (CDT)
Personal tools
wiki navigation