Talk:Argument from the second law of thermodynamics
(Difference between revisions)
Daemonowner (Talk | contribs) (response to creationists) |
Daemonowner (Talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== response to creationists == | == response to creationists == | ||
| − | since this argument is nonsense, i propose a sort of tongue in cheek nonsense response; something along the lines of "yeah, well creationism breaks the third!". | + | since this argument is nonsense, i propose a sort of tongue in cheek nonsense response; something along the lines of "yeah, well creationism breaks the third!". [[User:Daemonowner|Daemonowner]] |
Revision as of 18:19, 2 October 2010
This should be merged into Thermodynamics. --Arensb 08:43, 5 June 2010 (CDT)
response to creationists
since this argument is nonsense, i propose a sort of tongue in cheek nonsense response; something along the lines of "yeah, well creationism breaks the third!". Daemonowner
