Talk:Argument from the second law of thermodynamics
(Difference between revisions)
Quantheory (Talk | contribs) m (Talk:Argument From the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics moved to Talk:Argument from the second law of thermodynamics: more appropriate article name) |
Daemonowner (Talk | contribs) (response to creationists) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This should be merged into [[Thermodynamics]]. --[[User:Arensb|Arensb]] 08:43, 5 June 2010 (CDT) | This should be merged into [[Thermodynamics]]. --[[User:Arensb|Arensb]] 08:43, 5 June 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == response to creationists == | ||
| + | |||
| + | since this argument is nonsense, i propose a sort of tongue in cheek nonsense response; something along the lines of "yeah, well creationism breaks the third!". | ||
Revision as of 18:19, 2 October 2010
This should be merged into Thermodynamics. --Arensb 08:43, 5 June 2010 (CDT)
response to creationists
since this argument is nonsense, i propose a sort of tongue in cheek nonsense response; something along the lines of "yeah, well creationism breaks the third!".
