Talk:Argument from design
(Difference between revisions)
Sans Deity (Talk | contribs) |
(copy paste violations?) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:: I'm really not familiar with any claims like that and I can't really see how the rebuttal would be very different, but if there's a real argument there and it needs a response, feel free. [[User:Sans Deity|Sans Deity]] 13:06, 22 May 2007 (CDT) | :: I'm really not familiar with any claims like that and I can't really see how the rebuttal would be very different, but if there's a real argument there and it needs a response, feel free. [[User:Sans Deity|Sans Deity]] 13:06, 22 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==Copy paste violations== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Whilst additions are always welcome, the last addition to this page just looks like a massive copy paste from another website or pdf ebook. It even still has reference page numbers in there... whats going on? | ||
Revision as of 09:12, 12 February 2010
I'm planning on expanding the "rock" section to cover natural rock formations vs. art created with rocks to demonstrate a bit more about complexity and the perception of design. Sans Deity 09:58, 26 June 2006 (MST)
Multiple creators
Matt, what about something in relation to the possibilty of multiple creators/designers?
- I'm really not familiar with any claims like that and I can't really see how the rebuttal would be very different, but if there's a real argument there and it needs a response, feel free. Sans Deity 13:06, 22 May 2007 (CDT)
Copy paste violations
Whilst additions are always welcome, the last addition to this page just looks like a massive copy paste from another website or pdf ebook. It even still has reference page numbers in there... whats going on?
