Talk:50 reasons to believe in God

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
To be honest, so much of this is simply gibberish, it's going to take a while to sort out proper responses.  And we thought Gish galloping was dead! [[User:Nullifidian|Nullifidian]] 14:01, 18 June 2008 (CDT)
 
To be honest, so much of this is simply gibberish, it's going to take a while to sort out proper responses.  And we thought Gish galloping was dead! [[User:Nullifidian|Nullifidian]] 14:01, 18 June 2008 (CDT)
  
Many of them can all be lumped together or the responses can be repeated.  For instance, 15-20 may probably all be dismissed with [[Douglas Adams]]' "sentient puddle" analogy.  What is that argument called, again?
+
Many of them can all be lumped together or the responses can be repeated.  For instance, 15-20 may probably all be dismissed with [[Douglas Adams]]' "sentient puddle" analogy.  Is there another name for that besides the fine tuning argument? --[[User:Kazim|Kazim]] 15:37, 18 June 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 15:37, 18 June 2008

To be honest, so much of this is simply gibberish, it's going to take a while to sort out proper responses. And we thought Gish galloping was dead! Nullifidian 14:01, 18 June 2008 (CDT)

Many of them can all be lumped together or the responses can be repeated. For instance, 15-20 may probably all be dismissed with Douglas Adams' "sentient puddle" analogy. Is there another name for that besides the fine tuning argument? --Kazim 15:37, 18 June 2008 (CDT)

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox