User contributions
- 00:26, 7 February 2013 (diff | hist) Moral argument (This edit shows a different way of looking at why the moral argument is self refuting. It also shows a potential fallacy of equivocation.)
- 16:02, 4 February 2013 (diff | hist) m Talk:Argument from personal experience
- 15:59, 4 February 2013 (diff | hist) Talk:Argument from personal experience
- 17:18, 2 November 2012 (diff | hist) m User talk:Sans Deity (top)
- 17:14, 2 November 2012 (diff | hist) m User talk:David Gilliam (top)
- 17:13, 2 November 2012 (diff | hist) m Pascal's Wager (Temporarily moving the firefighter argument pending Matt Dillahunty's approval and opinion. It will be on my talk page)
- 17:04, 2 November 2012 (diff | hist) User talk:David Gilliam
- 12:46, 2 November 2012 (diff | hist) m User talk:Sans Deity (Just wanted to hear your opinion on me posting one of your arguments against pascal's wager (I attributed it to you in the title so people know that the argument is not mine))
- 11:17, 2 November 2012 (diff | hist) User talk:David Gilliam
- 11:15, 2 November 2012 (diff | hist) User talk:David Gilliam
- 11:14, 2 November 2012 (diff | hist) User talk:David Gilliam
- 10:46, 2 November 2012 (diff | hist) User talk:David Gilliam
- 10:43, 2 November 2012 (diff | hist) m User talk:Jdog (Response to your post about logic) (top)
- 00:12, 2 November 2012 (diff | hist) m Pascal's Wager (Moving the counter arguments from my last edit from the fallacy section to the counter argument section.)
- 00:10, 2 November 2012 (diff | hist) Pascal's Wager (I added two more objections to the wager. Each objecting to the morality or practicality of the wager. This also includes Matt Dillahunty's objection, though I intensified it a little bit to make it stronger.)
- 23:45, 1 November 2012 (diff | hist) m Divine command theory (Asking a hard question about DCT. Basically if murder can be justified by DCT, then what cannot be justified by DCT. If DCT is true then is there any immoral act?)
- 23:34, 1 November 2012 (diff | hist) m Moral argument (Responding to the apologist claim "if god does not exist then we are just animals" by pointing out that we are animals and just because the truth hurts does not make it any less true. I also aks why anyone should presuppose being an animal is bad)
- 23:38, 31 October 2012 (diff | hist) User talk:David Gilliam
- 23:37, 31 October 2012 (diff | hist) User talk:David Gilliam
- 23:31, 31 October 2012 (diff | hist) m Natural-law argument (This explicitly states what counter argument "Special Pleading c1: Which god?" implies: the natural law argument is invalid and is therefore unsound.) (top)
- 21:02, 31 October 2012 (diff | hist) m Pascal's Wager (This is the second minor edit to this page. The first described how Pascal's Wager committed the fallacy of appeal to emotion. This edit simply gives a reference link.)
- 20:58, 31 October 2012 (diff | hist) m Pascal's Wager
