So you believe in nothing?

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(wikify a bit; some minor copyediting; remove two seemingly irrelevant contriubtiuons)
(Changed 1st use of Christians to Theists, as the objection is equally open to any non-atheist.)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Christian]]s often respond to assertions of [[atheism]] with the question, "'''So you believe in nothing?'''" Such a question not only patently mischaracterizes the nature of atheism, but it betrays one of the inherent problems in Christian [[doctrine]]: the potential for development of a type of "Christian [[nihilism]]," in which adherents see all meaning and value as only derived from [[God]].
+
[[Theist]]s often respond to assertions of [[atheism]] with the question, "'''So you believe in nothing?'''" Such a question not only patently mischaracterizes the nature of atheism, but it betrays one of the inherent problems in Christian [[doctrine]]: the potential for development of a type of "Christian [[nihilism]]," in which adherents see all meaning and value as only derived from [[God]].
  
 
In a similar way that accusations that [[atheism is immoral]], as it lacks guidelines dictated from a "higher power," this question essentially implies that humans are incapable of independent and complex thought, a concept heavily debunked in numerous examples worldwide. Begin by considering the fact that many [[Buddhist]]s, despite having complex systems of [[dogma]] and [[spiritual]] beliefs, are atheists by definition, in that they reject the concept of any sort of god. While some schools of Buddhism differ from this interpretation, there are significant numbers of people practicing what otherwise fits the definition of a religion, while asserting that their beliefs and dogma come not from a divine authority.
 
In a similar way that accusations that [[atheism is immoral]], as it lacks guidelines dictated from a "higher power," this question essentially implies that humans are incapable of independent and complex thought, a concept heavily debunked in numerous examples worldwide. Begin by considering the fact that many [[Buddhist]]s, despite having complex systems of [[dogma]] and [[spiritual]] beliefs, are atheists by definition, in that they reject the concept of any sort of god. While some schools of Buddhism differ from this interpretation, there are significant numbers of people practicing what otherwise fits the definition of a religion, while asserting that their beliefs and dogma come not from a divine authority.

Revision as of 21:59, 7 December 2010

Theists often respond to assertions of atheism with the question, "So you believe in nothing?" Such a question not only patently mischaracterizes the nature of atheism, but it betrays one of the inherent problems in Christian doctrine: the potential for development of a type of "Christian nihilism," in which adherents see all meaning and value as only derived from God.

In a similar way that accusations that atheism is immoral, as it lacks guidelines dictated from a "higher power," this question essentially implies that humans are incapable of independent and complex thought, a concept heavily debunked in numerous examples worldwide. Begin by considering the fact that many Buddhists, despite having complex systems of dogma and spiritual beliefs, are atheists by definition, in that they reject the concept of any sort of god. While some schools of Buddhism differ from this interpretation, there are significant numbers of people practicing what otherwise fits the definition of a religion, while asserting that their beliefs and dogma come not from a divine authority.

How, then, is a "true" atheist any different? Countless schools of philosophy serve as a basis for development of secular belief. Consider (secular) existentialism, which revolves around the concept of self-discovery and finding meaning and value in a way relevant to one's own life and worldview. Many philosophers and self-described existentialists have written works detailing quite complex systems of epistemology (in a sense, "What can we know?"), morality, and more, without ever involving God.

Whether atheists describe themselves as existentialist or not, the framework of existentialism shows how, outside of the bounds of any defined religion, one may find belief, meaning, and value in a purely secular way.


v · d Common objections to atheism and counter-apologetics
Personal   Why are you trying to tear down other people's faith? · Why can't everyone just have their own beliefs? · What are your qualifications? · Atheists believe in nothing · You are a communist · Why do atheists inspire such hatred? · That's not my God
Religious   That's not in my Bible · They're not true Christians · You just want to sin · Atheists know there is a God · It takes more faith to disbelieve than it does to believe · God doesn't believe in atheists · Science is a faith · Atheism is a religion · Atheists worship materialism · Hypocrisy of celebrating religious holidays · Atheism is based on faith · Religious belief is beneficial
Science and logic   You can't prove God doesn't exist · Science can't touch god · God can't be defined · So you think we came from nothing / pondsoup / monkeys? · If God didn't create everything, who did? · That might be true for you, but its not true for me · Religion is another way of knowing · Apologetics and dinosaurs
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox