Religion provides hope

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(First draft)
 
(Subsection titles; religion and despair)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
==Counter-arguments==
 
==Counter-arguments==
 
+
===Red herring===
 
Whether or not [[religion]] provides hope or meaning has nothing to do with whether it is true.
 
Whether or not [[religion]] provides hope or meaning has nothing to do with whether it is true.
  
 +
===Is this desirable?===
 
This argument is comparable to the statement, "It would be cruel to take away someone's antidepressants, since that person would succumb to depression". This may be true in some (perhaps even many) cases, but in general it is better to raise people not to require drugs to be happy. Similarly, it is better to be able to find hope and meaning without having to resort to religion.
 
This argument is comparable to the statement, "It would be cruel to take away someone's antidepressants, since that person would succumb to depression". This may be true in some (perhaps even many) cases, but in general it is better to raise people not to require drugs to be happy. Similarly, it is better to be able to find hope and meaning without having to resort to religion.
 +
 +
===Religion also provides despair===
 +
This argument also ignores the fact that for many people, religion brings unhappiness: in many forms of religion, people are told that having sexual thoughts is a [[sin]]; homosexuals are told that they are vile and wicked; and some denominations preach that all humans, no matter how much good they do, are miserable sinners who deserve to be tortured for all eternity.
 +
 +
The hope that such religions provide is not the uplifting hope of improving one's future, but rather the hope of evading just punishment.
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==

Revision as of 11:29, 7 April 2008

One common apologetic is the argument that religion provides hope, or meaning, or the assurance of the love of God, and that taking away a person's religion would be cruel.

Contents

Counter-arguments

Red herring

Whether or not religion provides hope or meaning has nothing to do with whether it is true.

Is this desirable?

This argument is comparable to the statement, "It would be cruel to take away someone's antidepressants, since that person would succumb to depression". This may be true in some (perhaps even many) cases, but in general it is better to raise people not to require drugs to be happy. Similarly, it is better to be able to find hope and meaning without having to resort to religion.

Religion also provides despair

This argument also ignores the fact that for many people, religion brings unhappiness: in many forms of religion, people are told that having sexual thoughts is a sin; homosexuals are told that they are vile and wicked; and some denominations preach that all humans, no matter how much good they do, are miserable sinners who deserve to be tortured for all eternity.

The hope that such religions provide is not the uplifting hope of improving one's future, but rather the hope of evading just punishment.

See also

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox