Nonoverlapping magisteria

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(wikify sections)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Nonoverlapping magisteria]] or '''''NOMA''''' is the concept, originally presented by [[Stephen Jay Gould]], that:
+
'''Nonoverlapping magisteria''' (or '''NOMA''') is the concept, originally presented by [[Stephen Jay Gould]], that:
 
{{quote|Science and religion are not in conflict, for their teachings occupy distinctly different domains.}}
 
{{quote|Science and religion are not in conflict, for their teachings occupy distinctly different domains.}}
  
Line 7: Line 7:
 
{{Quote|Scientists, like many others, are touched with awe at the order and complexity of nature. Indeed, many scientists are deeply religious. But science and religion occupy two separate realms of human experience. Demanding that they be combined detracts from the glory of each.}}
 
{{Quote|Scientists, like many others, are touched with awe at the order and complexity of nature. Indeed, many scientists are deeply religious. But science and religion occupy two separate realms of human experience. Demanding that they be combined detracts from the glory of each.}}
  
===Objections===
+
==Objections==
  
 
The primary objection to this premise, by both religionists and scientists, is that acceptable boundaries cannot be defined.
 
The primary objection to this premise, by both religionists and scientists, is that acceptable boundaries cannot be defined.
Line 23: Line 23:
 
* NOMA serves to, as Richard Dawkins argues, shield religion from scientific scrutiny. The God hypothesis that there exists an all powerful man who created humans and other life forms and created the universe is at its core a scientific hypothesis open to falsifiability.  
 
* NOMA serves to, as Richard Dawkins argues, shield religion from scientific scrutiny. The God hypothesis that there exists an all powerful man who created humans and other life forms and created the universe is at its core a scientific hypothesis open to falsifiability.  
  
===Parodies===
+
==Parodies==
 
* Not Opposing Metaphysical Asininity
 
* Not Opposing Metaphysical Asininity
  
==External Links==
+
==External links==
 
*[http://www.stephenjaygould.org/library/gould_noma.html Stephen Jay Gould's description of NOMA]
 
*[http://www.stephenjaygould.org/library/gould_noma.html Stephen Jay Gould's description of NOMA]
 
*[http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/dawkins_18_2.html A response from Richard Dawkins]
 
*[http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/dawkins_18_2.html A response from Richard Dawkins]

Revision as of 15:01, 27 November 2007

Nonoverlapping magisteria (or NOMA) is the concept, originally presented by Stephen Jay Gould, that:

"Science and religion are not in conflict, for their teachings occupy distinctly different domains."

This position is accepted by many modern theists as it allows them to reconcile apparent contradictions. With science and religion in non-competitive domains, one is free to hold supernatural beliefs and still accept scientific explanations of the natural world.

The NAS released a statement endorsing this same idea in 1997 [1]:

"Scientists, like many others, are touched with awe at the order and complexity of nature. Indeed, many scientists are deeply religious. But science and religion occupy two separate realms of human experience. Demanding that they be combined detracts from the glory of each."

Objections

The primary objection to this premise, by both religionists and scientists, is that acceptable boundaries cannot be defined.

  • Fundamentalists and Biblical literalists believe that placing limits on religion is tantamount to placing limits on God and that God's transcendent nature dictates that nothing is beyond the scope of religion. For these believers, the answers provided by science are acceptable until they contradict knowledge revealed by God.
  • Many scientists argue that an obvious boundary exists (natural/supernatural) but that religion generally refuses to remain within its domain, while religionists argue that science is continually encroaching into its territory by examining the questions of human origins, consciousness and even morality. Materialists respond that religion overstepped its boundaries long ago, by filling gaps in our knowledge with dogmatic assertions that, as our understanding has grown, have been replaced with naturalistic explanations.
  • This observation is historically supported, and the conflict between science and religion is well documented. If something is initially considered supernatural (magnetism, for example) and science later provides a naturalistic explanation, how can anything be considered beyond the scope of scientific investigation?
  • Indeed, scientific investigation rooted in rational, naturalistic materialism has proven to be the most consistent and reliable method of explaining reality.
  • Gould defined magisterium as "a domain where one form of teaching holds the appropriate tools for meaningful discourse and resolution" - However, one could argue that within religion there is no meaningful discourse or resolution or tools for such ends, as such religion isn't a magisterium at all.
  • NOMA serves to, as Richard Dawkins argues, shield religion from scientific scrutiny. The God hypothesis that there exists an all powerful man who created humans and other life forms and created the universe is at its core a scientific hypothesis open to falsifiability.

Parodies

  • Not Opposing Metaphysical Asininity

External links

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox