No-reason argument
(Difference between revisions)
Benjaburns (Talk | contribs) |
m (Removed less-specific categories) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The "No Reason" argument states that a perfect god would have no desire to create the universe since the very state of perfection carries with it the implication that one has everything one needs or wants. Thus, the Christian god is the "perfect" victim of this argument. | The "No Reason" argument states that a perfect god would have no desire to create the universe since the very state of perfection carries with it the implication that one has everything one needs or wants. Thus, the Christian god is the "perfect" victim of this argument. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
[[Category: Inductive arguments]] | [[Category: Inductive arguments]] | ||
Revision as of 12:07, 7 April 2007
The "No Reason" argument states that a perfect god would have no desire to create the universe since the very state of perfection carries with it the implication that one has everything one needs or wants. Thus, the Christian god is the "perfect" victim of this argument.
