Mythical being
(Difference between revisions)
m |
TommyHolland (Talk | contribs) m (typos) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
* ''Atheist:'' "[[You can't prove God doesn't exist|Prove it]]." | * ''Atheist:'' "[[You can't prove God doesn't exist|Prove it]]." | ||
* ''Theist:'' "I don't have to! No one really believes in leprechauns." | * ''Theist:'' "I don't have to! No one really believes in leprechauns." | ||
| − | * '' | + | * ''Atheist:'' "Do you have ''evidence'' that they don't exist?" |
* ''Theist:'' "No, but you don't have evidence that they do." | * ''Theist:'' "No, but you don't have evidence that they do." | ||
| − | * '' | + | * ''Atheist:'' "You're right. But why not believe in them anyway, since we don't have good evidence either way?" |
* (and so forth...) | * (and so forth...) | ||
[[Category:Mythology]] | [[Category:Mythology]] | ||
Revision as of 15:07, 17 June 2009
For more information, see the Wikipedia article:
A mythical creature is a fictional living thing, usually an animal or animal-like organism, that exists only in mythology or folklore. Sometimes these creatures have magical powers, sometimes not.
Examples of (mostly) non-religious, mythical creatures include:
Because most theists agree that non-religious mythical creatures do not really exist, they often serve as good substitutes for God (or angels, etc.) in counter-apologetics, either to show the weakness of a theist's argument, or to show the reasonableness of a corresponding counter-argument — especially in the context of the reasonableness of belief without evidence, or the nature of burden of proof when applied to issues of existence.
Example
- Atheist: "Do you believe in leprechauns?"
- Theist: "No."
- Atheist: "Why not?"
- Theist: "Because they obviously don't exist."
- Atheist: "Prove it."
- Theist: "I don't have to! No one really believes in leprechauns."
- Atheist: "Do you have evidence that they don't exist?"
- Theist: "No, but you don't have evidence that they do."
- Atheist: "You're right. But why not believe in them anyway, since we don't have good evidence either way?"
- (and so forth...)
