Moving the goalposts

From Iron Chariots Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(deleted material from sw)
(formatting; other copyediting, wikif. -- I still don't like it, but...)
 
(One intermediate revision by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{stub}}
+
{{argument-stub}}
  
'''Moving the Goalposts''' is a [[logical fallacy]] in which, upon being presented with evidence against his claims, one redefines them.
+
'''Moving the goalposts''' is the practice of arbitrarily changing the criteria for "proof" or acceptance of a claim out of the range of whatever evidence currently exists in the argument.
  
==Related Topics==  
+
Example:
 +
*''Apologist:'' Evolution must be false because life forms obviously don't change.
 +
*''Counter-Apologist:'' Breeders have developed hundreds of unique breeds in just the past 300 years.
 +
*''A:'' Well, that's just microevolution. You can't create a new species.
 +
*''C:'' Ever try to cross a Chihuahua with a Great Dane?<!-- ?? -->
 +
*''A:'' Ok, but you just get a new species<!-- ?? --> of the same kind. You can't create a new kind.
 +
 
 +
It should be noted that changing criteria is a fundamental part of [[science]]. Science must be able to reject earlier, less precise theories in order to adopt more accurate worldviews. An example is Newtonian physics, which becomes an inaccurate predictor of events when applied to very small objects (like electrons) or to objects moving at relativistic speeds.
 +
 
 +
The difference between legitimate modification and "moving the goalposts" is the ''ad hoc'' nature of the latter.
 +
 
 +
==See also==  
 
*[[No true Scotsman fallacy]]
 
*[[No true Scotsman fallacy]]

Latest revision as of 02:57, 10 February 2011


Moving the goalposts is the practice of arbitrarily changing the criteria for "proof" or acceptance of a claim out of the range of whatever evidence currently exists in the argument.

Example:

  • Apologist: Evolution must be false because life forms obviously don't change.
  • Counter-Apologist: Breeders have developed hundreds of unique breeds in just the past 300 years.
  • A: Well, that's just microevolution. You can't create a new species.
  • C: Ever try to cross a Chihuahua with a Great Dane?
  • A: Ok, but you just get a new species of the same kind. You can't create a new kind.

It should be noted that changing criteria is a fundamental part of science. Science must be able to reject earlier, less precise theories in order to adopt more accurate worldviews. An example is Newtonian physics, which becomes an inaccurate predictor of events when applied to very small objects (like electrons) or to objects moving at relativistic speeds.

The difference between legitimate modification and "moving the goalposts" is the ad hoc nature of the latter.

See also

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox