Laminin argument

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(External links)
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
==Counter arguments==
 
==Counter arguments==
 +
===Biblical inaccuracy===
 +
The earliest known copies of the gospels use the word ''stauros'' for Jesus's cross. According to historians of the time, the stauros crucifixion was done as a "T" shape. Jesus's cross was not cross-shaped.
 +
 
===[[Association fallacy]]===
 
===[[Association fallacy]]===
A commonly used ''illustrative format'' of the structure of laminin can be said to resemble a cross (among other things, such as a sword or caduceus). The actual protein itself would have to be manipulated from the form it takes in nature in order to resemble a cross.
+
A commonly used ''illustrative format'' of the structure of laminin can be said to resemble a cross (among other things, such as a sword or caduceus [the latter being a symbol of the Greek god Hermes], or even an ''inverted'' cross [which is often displayed to ''mock'' the Christian god]). The actual protein itself would have to be manipulated from the form it takes in nature in order to resemble a cross.
  
 
===[[Cherry picking]]===
 
===[[Cherry picking]]===
Line 30: Line 33:
 
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0-NPPIeeRk&feature=related] - Youtube clip of Giglio making the laminin argument
 
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0-NPPIeeRk&feature=related] - Youtube clip of Giglio making the laminin argument
 
*[http://cwgk.blogspot.com/2011/04/lame-argument-about-laminin.html A lame argument about laminin] A good rebuttal
 
*[http://cwgk.blogspot.com/2011/04/lame-argument-about-laminin.html A lame argument about laminin] A good rebuttal
*[http://www.radicalruss.com/?p=1388 Many other molecules have shapes that can be seen or imagined as special in many different religions].
+
*[http://www.radicalruss.com/?p=1388 Many other molecules have shapes that can be seen or imagined as special for many different religions].  Laminin is not unique.
  
 
===Reference===
 
===Reference===

Revision as of 07:32, 14 December 2011

The laminin argument is an attempt to prove the existence of the Christian god. The argument promotes the idea that God left a hallmark of its creation of living beings in the form of the laminin glycoprotein.

Contents

Background information

The pastor Louie Giglio promotes this argument in one of his DVD sermons. It has since been passed around in chain letter e-mails and social networking sites.

Argument

p1. Laminin is a protein that bonds living cells together.
p2. Laminin is shaped like a cross.
p3. The cross is the symbol of Christianity.
c1. Laminin's shape is the signature or hallmark of an intelligent designer
c2. That designer is the Christian god.

Counter arguments

Biblical inaccuracy

The earliest known copies of the gospels use the word stauros for Jesus's cross. According to historians of the time, the stauros crucifixion was done as a "T" shape. Jesus's cross was not cross-shaped.

Association fallacy

A commonly used illustrative format of the structure of laminin can be said to resemble a cross (among other things, such as a sword or caduceus [the latter being a symbol of the Greek god Hermes], or even an inverted cross [which is often displayed to mock the Christian god]). The actual protein itself would have to be manipulated from the form it takes in nature in order to resemble a cross.

Cherry picking

Laminin is not the only protein or cell found in animal connective tissues. None of the others (nor their structural illustrations) can be said to be shaped like a cross.

As noted above, laminin is only found in animals. Is it being suggested that another entity designed the plants?

Graven image

A common criticism of Christianity is that it breaks the second commandment (of the Biblical Ten Commandments) by the use of the cross or crucifix as a symbol of worship. If this is an accurate criticism, then the Christian god is encouraging the breaking of its own commandments.

False dilemma

Even if intelligent design was proven, it does not prove the Christian god was involved. Extraterrestrials that use a cross as a symbol are one of the many other possibilities.

External links

Reference


v · d Arguments for the existence of god
Anthropic arguments   Anthropic principle · Natural-law argument
Arguments for belief   Pascal's Wager · Argument from faith · Just hit your knees
Christological arguments   Argument from scriptural miracles · Would someone die for a lie? · Liar, Lunatic or Lord
Cosmological arguments   Argument from aesthetic experience · Argument from contingency · Cosmological argument · Fine-tuning argument · Kalam · Leibniz cosmological argument · Principle of sufficient reason · Unmoved mover · Why is there something rather than nothing?
Majority arguments   Argument from admired religious scientists
Moral arguments   Argument from justice · Divine command theory
Ontological argument   Argument from degree · Argument from desire · Argument from the origin of the idea of God
Dogmatic arguments   Argument from divine sense · Argument from uniqueness
Teleological arguments   Argument from design · Banana argument · 747 Junkyard argument · Laminin argument · Argument from natural disasters
Testimonial arguments   Argument from observed miracles · Argument from personal experience · Consciousness argument for the existence of God · Emotional pleas
Transcendental arguments   God created numbers · Argument from the meaning of life
Scriptural arguments   Scriptural inerrancy · Scriptural scientific foreknowledge · Scriptural codes
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox