John of Salisbury

From Iron Chariots Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(addl. wikif.)
m (DEFAULTSORT (checked with Wikipedia))
 
Line 7: Line 7:
 
In this manner, John of Salisbury argued that what is just is defined by the will of the Prince, because not only is the Prince’s authority derived from God, but he is subject only to God, and is God’s representative on Earth.  Despite this, John of Salisbury does put forth one independent measure with which a ruler can be judged.  He says that a tyrant is a ruler that forces his subjects away from God, whereas a Prince is one that brings his subjects closer to God.
 
In this manner, John of Salisbury argued that what is just is defined by the will of the Prince, because not only is the Prince’s authority derived from God, but he is subject only to God, and is God’s representative on Earth.  Despite this, John of Salisbury does put forth one independent measure with which a ruler can be judged.  He says that a tyrant is a ruler that forces his subjects away from God, whereas a Prince is one that brings his subjects closer to God.
  
 +
{{DEFAULTSORT:Salisbury, John of}}
 
[[Category:People]]
 
[[Category:People]]

Latest revision as of 10:57, 12 March 2012

Wikipedia-logo-en.png
For more information, see the Wikipedia article:

John of Salisbury (born c. 1120; died c. 1180) built upon a logical extension of the work of St. Augustine when it is applied explicitly to the relationship between politics and religion. While St. Augustine’s work was more of an abstract defense of Christianity and an imagining of what an ideal society would look like, John of Salisbury argued directly for the supremacy of ecclesiastical power over temporal powers.

In The Statesman's Book, John of Salisbury argued for the divine right of kings:

"The power which the prince has is therefore from God, for the power of God is never lost, nor severed from Him, but He merely exercises it through a subordinate hand, making all things teach His mercy or justice. ‘Who therefore, resists the ruling power, resists the ordinance of God.’"

In this manner, John of Salisbury argued that what is just is defined by the will of the Prince, because not only is the Prince’s authority derived from God, but he is subject only to God, and is God’s representative on Earth. Despite this, John of Salisbury does put forth one independent measure with which a ruler can be judged. He says that a tyrant is a ruler that forces his subjects away from God, whereas a Prince is one that brings his subjects closer to God.

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox