Jesus fulfilled prophecy
This page is intended to contain a list of claims of fulfilled prophecy and responses.
There are literally hundreds of claimed instances where Jesus fulfilled prophecies. It would take forever to list all the responses. But the vast majority of them can be disregarded as non-evidence simply due to their very nature.
For example one prophecy says that the messiah existed before the rest of creation. This would obviously be impossible to prove or disprove and so it doesn't count. You would first have to prove that Jesus pre-existed everything in order to assert that he fulfilled this prophecy.
Also, most of these require us to exept what the Bible says at face value. So therefore they would only be convincing if you ALREADY accepted the Bible as true. This is an example of circular reasoning.
We know the Bible is true because the prophecies in it were fulfilled. We know the prophecies in the Bible were fulfilled because it says they were.
Here are some of the more convincing, and less easily nullified 'prophecies'.
About his birth
Genesis 3:15 Supposedly means that the messiah would be born of a human woman. However the only alternatives are that he would be born of a man, some form of animal, or simply poofed into existence on earth. Both of which would have been much more amazing. It would take a miracle for this one NOT to have come true.
Isaiah 7:14 14Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel. It is said that this verse is prophecying that the messiah would be born of a virgin. But whether his mother was acctually a virgin at the time cannot be proven. After all she was dating at the time. We are just supposed to believe that she was acctually a virgin because the Bible, or more specifically, Matthew says so. Plus nobody called Jesus 'Immanuel' except one time when Matthew was refferencing this very scripture, almost like an afterthought.
Genesis 22:18 In this verse god is promising Abraham that in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed. Apologists claim that this meens that the messiah would be one of Abraham's decendants. That's not what god said. And even if it is, then it's not true anyway. The geneologies recorded in Matthew and Luke are based on his fathers line. If Mary was really a virgin when she gave birth to Jesus, then Jesus was not Joseph's son. So if that's what god meant when talking to Abraham, then we have to believe that the geneologies recorded in the gospels are accurate, even though they both conflict.
Micah 5:2 2But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting. Apologists say that this means that the messiah would be born in Bethlehem, which according to the Gospel is where Jesus was born.
But Jesus did not become the ruler of Israel. Plus that's hardly a convincing prophecy anyway. It's more like a requirement then a prediction, since nobody from anywhere else would have been considered.
Jeremiah 31:15 15Thus saith the LORD; A voice was heard in Ramah, lamentation, and bitter weeping; Rahel weeping for her children refused to be comforted for her children, because they were not. According to Matthew, this was actually a prophecy about king Herod killing the children of Bethlehem.
But taken in context this scripture is nothing like a prophecy. It's a documentation of events that already happened to Rahel, followed by comfort because her children will return. Plus Ramah is over 20 miles from Bethlehem. It's worth mentioning, that Matthew is the only record of this slaughter even taking place. If all the young children in that area were murdured by the king, you'd think there would be a whole bunch of poems, songs, stories and records of that. Not to mention the angry mobs demanding revenge.