Is theistic religion a consolation?

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
 
m (Cat)
(One intermediate revision by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Theistic Religion can be a consolation in some scenarios, but not all. It has tended to be largely negative throughout history with many deaths and much sadness caused.
+
Theistic Religion can be a consolation in some scenarios, but not all. It has tended to be largely negative throughout history with many deaths and much sadness caused. Whilst people may find comfort in their beliefs, it should be noted that this comfort is from delusion. They are believing in superstition and the supernatural for purely emotional reasons, without the backing of empirical evidence.
Whilst people may find comfort in their beliefs, it should be noted that this comfort is from delusion. They are believing in superstition and the supernatural for purely emotional reasons, without the backing of emperical evidence.
+
 
It may be argued that as long as their is a benefit on some level, then the belief is justified. True, although the negatives of a belief should be assessed as well. when considering a religions benefit, one should also consider what it's effect on others is, and has been. for example; Christianity has obvious consolationary benefits for someone, but the negatives for the belief include opression, depression, racism, sexism and homophobia in some instances.  
+
It may be argued from a Utilitarian standpoint that as long as there is a benefit on some level, then the belief is justified. To keep true to this Utilitarian assessment though, the negatives of a belief should be assessed as well. It can easily be argued that any acceptance of concepts which contradict empirical information weaken those holding the belief.  Consider that "ignorance is bliss", for example the ignorance of the soon-to-be victim of a serial killer, might better be described as "ignorance is vulnerability".  Certainly the victim's belief in god would not have been more valuable then the knowledge of who was sneaking up behind them.
 +
 
 +
When considering a religions benefit (theistic or otherwise), one should also consider its effect on others, and has been. For example; Christianity has obvious consolatory benefits for someone, but the negatives have included oppression, depression, racism, sexism and homophobia.  
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
 
[[Why can't everyone just have their own beliefs?]]
 
[[Why can't everyone just have their own beliefs?]]
 +
 +
[[Category:Religion]]

Revision as of 13:30, 12 March 2012

Theistic Religion can be a consolation in some scenarios, but not all. It has tended to be largely negative throughout history with many deaths and much sadness caused. Whilst people may find comfort in their beliefs, it should be noted that this comfort is from delusion. They are believing in superstition and the supernatural for purely emotional reasons, without the backing of empirical evidence.

It may be argued from a Utilitarian standpoint that as long as there is a benefit on some level, then the belief is justified. To keep true to this Utilitarian assessment though, the negatives of a belief should be assessed as well. It can easily be argued that any acceptance of concepts which contradict empirical information weaken those holding the belief. Consider that "ignorance is bliss", for example the ignorance of the soon-to-be victim of a serial killer, might better be described as "ignorance is vulnerability". Certainly the victim's belief in god would not have been more valuable then the knowledge of who was sneaking up behind them.

When considering a religions benefit (theistic or otherwise), one should also consider its effect on others, and has been. For example; Christianity has obvious consolatory benefits for someone, but the negatives have included oppression, depression, racism, sexism and homophobia.

See also

Why can't everyone just have their own beliefs?

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox