God

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Small rearrangement)
(External Links: correct cat title)
(16 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Generally speaking, a god is a being with [[supernatural]] powers who receives [[worship]].
+
Generally speaking, a '''god''' (or "deity") is a being with [[supernatural]] powers who receives [[worship]].
  
Gods vary in the scope of their powers.  [[Yahweh]], the Christian God, is defined to be the [[omniscient]], [[omnipotent]], and [[omnibenevolent]] lone creator of the entire universe.  On the other hand, [[Greek gods]] such as [[Hermes]] and [[Dionysus]] are considerably less powerful, occupying a hierarchical pantheon, squabbling with fellow gods, and exhibiting human traits such as anger and jealousy.
+
[[Image:God.jpg|thumb|200px|right|[[Yahweh|The Christian God]], as depicted by Michelangelo.]]
 +
Gods vary in the scope of their powers.  [[Christianity|Christian]] [[theology]] has traditionally defined God ([[Yahweh]]) to be the [[omniscient]], [[omnipotent]], and [[omnibenevolent]] lone creator of the entire universe.  On the other hand, [[Greek gods]] such as [[Hermes]] and [[Dionysus]] are considerably less powerful, occupying a hierarchical [[pantheon]], squabbling with fellow gods, and exhibiting human traits such as anger and jealousy. However, some early books of the [[Bible]] seem to imply a finite god: In {{Bible|Genesis 18:20-21}}, God must personally visit [[Sodom and Gomorrah]] to see if they are as wicked as he has been told. In {{Bible|Judges 1:19}}, the men of [[Judah]] are unable to defeat the people of the plains, in spite of the fact that God was on their side. God's failure in this passage is attributed to the iron chariots of the enemy; this is the basis for the name of IronChariots.org.
  
 
==Counter-Apologetics==
 
==Counter-Apologetics==
  
The single most used argument against the existence of God, by far, is that there is no [[evidence]] for his existence.  An important principle of [[science]] is that [[extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence]].
+
By far the most straightforward argument against the existence of a god is that there is no [[evidence]] for it.  An important principle of [[science]] is that [[extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence]].
 +
 
 +
In the case of the Christian god, we are asked to explain the existence of a vast, complex, incomprehensible universe by inventing an even more vast, complex, incomprehensible being, which also happens to be intelligent enough to "plan" the entire history of the universe and still micromanage the details enough to answer [[prayer]]s, account for who will go to [[heaven]] and [[hell]], and deal with minutiae like how people deal with seemingly arbitrary rules about [[sex]].
 +
 
 +
Treated purely as an explanatory device, introducing a god into the universe raises far more questions than it answers.  It brings up the obvious question of [[Who created God?|who created God]].  Science tends to reason from the complex to the simple, finding explanations of natural phenomena by breaking them down into basic rules.  Of all the things we know of in the universe, intelligence in particular is one of the most complex and mysterious phenomena observed.  To suppose that we could "explain" the universe by introducing a universe-spanning intelligence is completely backwards from the way science normally operates.
 +
 
 +
All this would be strictly academic nitpicking if there were any positive evidence for the existence of a god.  Yet when pressed for evidence, apologists are notoriously vague.  Rather than pointing to specific reasons why anyone should believe in such an improbable being, they point to the [[Bible]] as a historically accurate text; they bring up philosophical vagaries such as the [[first cause argument]] and the [[argument from design]], and they threaten hell by means of [[Pascal's wager]].  No test is ever proposed to demonstrate or falsify the existence of God; God's existence is merely assumed to be a default position (which also invokes [[argumentum ad populum]]).
  
 
==Capitalization of "God"==
 
==Capitalization of "God"==
Line 12: Line 19:
  
 
Reverential religious texts often take the capitalization a step further when they are talking about their own gods, going so far as to capitalize pronouns that refer to the god.  For example: "I love Him"; "We are saved by His grace".
 
Reverential religious texts often take the capitalization a step further when they are talking about their own gods, going so far as to capitalize pronouns that refer to the god.  For example: "I love Him"; "We are saved by His grace".
 +
 +
==See also==
 +
*[[theism]]
 +
*[[monotheism]]
 +
*[[polytheism]]
 +
 +
==External Links==
 +
*[http://www.400monkeys.com/God/ The Official God FAQ]
 +
 +
{{Christianity}}
  
 
[[Category:Christianity]]
 
[[Category:Christianity]]
 
[[Category:Religious mythology]]
 
[[Category:Religious mythology]]

Revision as of 17:20, 23 May 2010

Generally speaking, a god (or "deity") is a being with supernatural powers who receives worship.

The Christian God, as depicted by Michelangelo.

Gods vary in the scope of their powers. Christian theology has traditionally defined God (Yahweh) to be the omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent lone creator of the entire universe. On the other hand, Greek gods such as Hermes and Dionysus are considerably less powerful, occupying a hierarchical pantheon, squabbling with fellow gods, and exhibiting human traits such as anger and jealousy. However, some early books of the Bible seem to imply a finite god: In Genesis 18:20-21 Bible-icon.png, God must personally visit Sodom and Gomorrah to see if they are as wicked as he has been told. In Judges 1:19 Bible-icon.png, the men of Judah are unable to defeat the people of the plains, in spite of the fact that God was on their side. God's failure in this passage is attributed to the iron chariots of the enemy; this is the basis for the name of IronChariots.org.

Contents

Counter-Apologetics

By far the most straightforward argument against the existence of a god is that there is no evidence for it. An important principle of science is that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

In the case of the Christian god, we are asked to explain the existence of a vast, complex, incomprehensible universe by inventing an even more vast, complex, incomprehensible being, which also happens to be intelligent enough to "plan" the entire history of the universe and still micromanage the details enough to answer prayers, account for who will go to heaven and hell, and deal with minutiae like how people deal with seemingly arbitrary rules about sex.

Treated purely as an explanatory device, introducing a god into the universe raises far more questions than it answers. It brings up the obvious question of who created God. Science tends to reason from the complex to the simple, finding explanations of natural phenomena by breaking them down into basic rules. Of all the things we know of in the universe, intelligence in particular is one of the most complex and mysterious phenomena observed. To suppose that we could "explain" the universe by introducing a universe-spanning intelligence is completely backwards from the way science normally operates.

All this would be strictly academic nitpicking if there were any positive evidence for the existence of a god. Yet when pressed for evidence, apologists are notoriously vague. Rather than pointing to specific reasons why anyone should believe in such an improbable being, they point to the Bible as a historically accurate text; they bring up philosophical vagaries such as the first cause argument and the argument from design, and they threaten hell by means of Pascal's wager. No test is ever proposed to demonstrate or falsify the existence of God; God's existence is merely assumed to be a default position (which also invokes argumentum ad populum).

Capitalization of "God"

As a point of grammar, the word "God" is usually capitalized when it refers to a particular god as a proper name; whereas "god" is in lowercase when it refers to one or more of a set of objects. For example: "I do not believe in your god."

Reverential religious texts often take the capitalization a step further when they are talking about their own gods, going so far as to capitalize pronouns that refer to the god. For example: "I love Him"; "We are saved by His grace".

See also

External Links


v · d Christianity
Christian beliefs   God · Jesus Christ · Moses · Resurrection · Atonement · Creationism · Sin · Afterlife · Eschatology · Other beliefs
Tenets and dogma   Ten Commandments · Dogma · Rituals · Homosexuality
Holy texts   Bible · Old Testament · New Testament · Gospels · Apocrypha · Ninety-Five Theses · Modern biblical translations
Christian denominations   Catholicism · Anglicanism · Lutheranism · Baptist · Evangelism · Pentecostal · Mormonism · Jehovah's Witnesses · Other denominations
History of Christianity   Overview of early Christianity · Overview of middle Christianity · Overview of modern Christianity
Christianity and politics   Dominionism · America as a Christian nation · Australia as a Christian nation · Separation of church and state · Christianity invented secularism · Blue laws · Notable Christian political parties
Christianity and science   Creation science · Intelligent design · Quantum mysticism · Christianity invented science
Christianity and medicine   Christian Science · Jehovah's Witnesses · Abortion · Contraception · Notable cases of medical negligence due to Christian beliefs
Christianity and Education   Teach the controversy · Abstinence-only sex education · Prayer in school · Religious universities · Theological studies · Comparative religion studies
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox