(add info from the 'gaps' page, and general info about fossils. more to come)
(transitional fossils redo)
|Line 2:||Line 2:|
A transitional fossil is one that bridges the evolutionary gap between two organisms. A fossil which is transitional between species
A transitional fossil is one that bridges the evolutionary gap between two organisms. A fossil which is transitional between species will typically have some features of both, and .
[[Creationist]]s claim that there is a lack of transitions in the fossil record against evolution.
, and like a
==Gaps in the Fossil Record==
==Gaps in the Fossil Record==
Revision as of 03:54, 2 February 2009
Fossils are the remains of organisms from the distant past embedded and preserved in the earth's crust. Fossils may be any sort of organism, from a single-celled bacteria to a tree leaf to a dinosaur, and may be anywhere from ten thousand to several billion years old. They usually consist of parts of the organism which were mineralized during the organism's lifetime, such as bones and exoskeletons.
A transitional fossil is one that bridges the evolutionary gap between two previously discovered organisms. A fossil which is transitional between two species will typically have some features of both, and several features which are developed halfway between the two.
Creationists claim that there is a lack of transitions in the fossil record in order to argue against evolution, but this is far from the truth. There are thousands of transitional forms. The following are some definitive examples of transitional forms between major extinct genuses and modern ones:
- Archaeopteryx, an intermediate form between theropod dinosaurs and modern birds, has both reptilian teeth and avian feathers, large wings but sideways shoulder joints, along with several features common to both.
- Tiktaalik, an intermediate form between fish and amphibians. It had gills and scales like a fish, lungs and rib bones and a movable neck like an amphibian, and fish-like fins with limb bones and a fully functional wrist joint with simple fingers.
Gaps in the Fossil Record
The argument that there are gaps in the fossil record is used extremely often by apologists and is basically the same as saying that there are no transitional fossils. There are several large problems with this argument, however:
- When Darwin's The Origin of Species was first published the fossil record was very sparse , and thus the size of the gaps it contained (i.e., between older species and their supposed descendants) was a problem for the theory of descent from a common ancestor. However, as the years passed scientists found more and more fossils, some of which "filled in" the gaps, thus decreasing the "jumps" required to move from one species to another. Nowadays gaps do still exist, and even though there are large gaps remaining, in many places the gaps are comparatively very small. It's not logical to assume that the gaps that exist nowadays will never be filled.
- In reality, there's almost no way to convince a creationist that transitional fossils exist. For example, suppose scientists don't know how one animal evolved into another. Creationists then tout this gap (the gap between fossil A and fossil B) as proof that there are no transitional fossils. However, when a transition (fossil C) is discovered between the two, the creationist will simply say that there are now two gaps, one between fossil A and fossil C and one between fossil C and fossil B. In other words, the more transitions are discovered, the more gaps creationists posit.