Evidentiary argument

From Iron Chariots Wiki
Revision as of 12:58, 23 November 2008 by Arensb (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

An evidentiary argument is an argument based on evidence. In apologetics and counter-apologetics the argument usually goes as follows:

Contents

Argument

  • There is no evidence for the existence of God.
  • There are good reasons for not believing in the existence of God.
  • We should not believe in a proposition for which there is no evidence.
    • We should not believe in the existence of God.
  • We should not believe in a proposition for which there are good reasons for not believing it.
    • We should not believe in the existence of God.

We should believe in propositions without evidence

This branch of defense arguments usually concern the idea of faith and the defenses thereof.

There is evidence for the existence of God

Good reasons for not believing in the existence of God


This is, much like Pascal's Wager, is an argument for belief rather than the existence of God. The thrust of the argument is that we shouldn't believe in God, not that there are not god(s).

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox