Daniel

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Minor cleanup and wikification.)
(Minor cleanup: spelling, links, etc.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{wikify}}
 
{{wikify}}
 
{{Books of the Bible}}
 
{{Books of the Bible}}
'''Daniel''' purports to be the account of a high ranking [[Jewish]] official in the court of Nebuchadnezzar.  The first half is largely heroic stories where the protagonists are protected from certain death by adhering strictly to Jewish law (e.g. not bowing to false [[god]]s).  The second half  is a series of increasing detailed prophecies about the coming 4 or 5 hundred years of history.
+
'''Daniel''' purports to be the account of a high ranking [[Jewish]] official in the court of Nebuchadnezzar.  The first half is largely heroic stories where the protagonists are protected from certain death by adhering strictly to Jewish law (e.g. not bowing to false [[god]]s).  The second half  is a series of increasingly-detailed prophecies about the coming four or five hundred years of history.
  
In reality the book is more likely a pious fraud written during the [[Maccabean revolt]] in the 2nd century BC (circa 165 B.C).  Besides the obvious fact that it is natural to be skeptical of claims of prophecy the following reasons are usually given to support the claim that this is not authentic prophecy.
+
In reality the book is more likely a [[pious fraud]] written during the [[Maccabean revolt]] in the 2nd century BC (circa 165 B.C).  Besides the obvious fact that it is natural to be [[skeptic]]al of claims of [[prophecy]], the following reasons are usually given to support the claim that this is not authentic prophecy.
  
* The history of Babylonia reported in Daniel doesn't match up with extra-biblical cources (E.g. lists wrong king of Judah when Nebuchadnezzar brings Jews into exile)
+
* The history of Babylonia reported in Daniel doesn't match up with extra-biblical cources (e.g., it lists the wrong king of Judah when Nebuchadnezzar brings the Jews into exile).
* The predictions between 6th century BC and 2nd century BC don't match well with the modern understanding of the history of that time period.  (The author of Daniel believed that the Medes were more powerful than Persians, whereas they had been conquered by the Persians).
+
* The predictions between the 6th and 2nd centuries BC don't match well with the modern understanding of the history of that time period.  (The author of Daniel believed that the Medes were more powerful than Persians, whereas they had been conquered by the Persians).
* The predictions about the early part of Maccabean revolt against Antiochus IV are suddenly very accurate (Battles, forced Hellenization of Jews, etc)
+
* The predictions about the early part of Maccabean revolt against Antiochus IV are suddenly very accurate (battles, forced Hellenization of Jews, etc)
* The later predictions about the Maccabean revolt are suddenly not accurate again.  (E.g. the immanent end of the world didn't occur, Antiochus didn't die where predicted)
+
* The later predictions about the Maccabean revolt are suddenly not accurate again.  (E.g. the imminent end of the world didn't occur, Antiochus didn't die where predicted).
  
Daniel is a favorite of evagelical end times theorists since its often vivid imagery can be matched Rorschach like to just about any current event.
+
Daniel is a favorite of [[evangelical]] end times theorists, since its often vivid imagery can be matched, Rorschach-like, to just about any current event.
  
 
==External Links==
 
==External Links==

Revision as of 00:04, 30 April 2007

This article needs to be formatted and/or linked to other articles according to our style guidelines.

Please remove this notice when this has been done.

Books of the Bible

Daniel purports to be the account of a high ranking Jewish official in the court of Nebuchadnezzar. The first half is largely heroic stories where the protagonists are protected from certain death by adhering strictly to Jewish law (e.g. not bowing to false gods). The second half is a series of increasingly-detailed prophecies about the coming four or five hundred years of history.

In reality the book is more likely a pious fraud written during the Maccabean revolt in the 2nd century BC (circa 165 B.C). Besides the obvious fact that it is natural to be skeptical of claims of prophecy, the following reasons are usually given to support the claim that this is not authentic prophecy.

  • The history of Babylonia reported in Daniel doesn't match up with extra-biblical cources (e.g., it lists the wrong king of Judah when Nebuchadnezzar brings the Jews into exile).
  • The predictions between the 6th and 2nd centuries BC don't match well with the modern understanding of the history of that time period. (The author of Daniel believed that the Medes were more powerful than Persians, whereas they had been conquered by the Persians).
  • The predictions about the early part of Maccabean revolt against Antiochus IV are suddenly very accurate (battles, forced Hellenization of Jews, etc)
  • The later predictions about the Maccabean revolt are suddenly not accurate again. (E.g. the imminent end of the world didn't occur, Antiochus didn't die where predicted).

Daniel is a favorite of evangelical end times theorists, since its often vivid imagery can be matched, Rorschach-like, to just about any current event.

External Links

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox