Crocoduck

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Crocoducks moved to Crocoduck: canonical singular)
(much copyediting/wikifyin; needs categories...)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Image:Crocoduck.jpg|thumb|Crocoduck]]
 
[[Image:Crocoduck.jpg|thumb|Crocoduck]]
The Crocoduck fallacy is one made by Apologist [[Kirk Cameron]] and was refuted immediately. All it ends up being is a [[straw man]] fallacy. Even though it was refuted Kirk was found to continuously use it mostly with his partner [[Ray Comfort]] (The banana man).
+
The '''Crocoduck''' fallacy is one made by [[apologist]] [[Kirk Cameron]] and was refuted immediately. It is an example of a [[straw man]] fallacy. Even though it was refuted, Cameron was found to continually use it, mostly with his partner [[Ray Comfort]] (the [[Banana argument|banana]] man).
  
The argument states that for [[evolution]] to be proved right, the sets of transitional fossils need to be completed, and according to Kirk, creatures such as the Crocoduck (Duck with a Crocodile head) need to be discovered.
+
The argument states that for [[evolution]] to be proved right, all sets of [[transitional fossil]]s would need to be completed and, according to Kirk, creatures such as the "Crocoduck" (a duck with a crocodile head) would need to be discovered.
This fallacy doesn't need much explaining: the theory of evolution does not state that a crocodile has to become a duck or that that precisely happened for evolution to be correct, even if a duck was supposed to have evolved directly into a crocodile nothing says that a duck would have a crocodile head aside from his photoshopped picture.
+
  
 +
==Counter-apologetics==
 +
This fallacy doesn't need much explaining: the theory of evolution does not state that a crocodile has to become a duck, or vice-versa, or that such a thing must have happened for evolution to be correct. Even if a duck were supposed to have evolved directly into a crocodile, nothing says that a duck would have a crocodile head aside from the Photoshopped picture at right.
  
The Crocoduck fallacy demonstrates Comfort's and Cameron's lack of understanding of biological evolution. Comfort and Cameron apparently believe that Darwinian evolution requires a direct, single-step ancestor between every species on the planet - there must have been not only a crocoduck, but also a croco-beaver and a beaver-duck predating the crocodile, beaver, and duck.
+
The Crocoduck fallacy demonstrates the complete lack of understanding of Comfort and Cameron regarding biological evolution. They apparently believe that [[Darwin]]ian evolution requires a direct, single-step ancestor between every two species on the planet. In other words, there must have been not only a crocoduck, but also a croco-beaver and a beaver-duck predating the crocodile, beaver, and duck.

Revision as of 15:29, 11 May 2011

Crocoduck

The Crocoduck fallacy is one made by apologist Kirk Cameron and was refuted immediately. It is an example of a straw man fallacy. Even though it was refuted, Cameron was found to continually use it, mostly with his partner Ray Comfort (the banana man).

The argument states that for evolution to be proved right, all sets of transitional fossils would need to be completed and, according to Kirk, creatures such as the "Crocoduck" (a duck with a crocodile head) would need to be discovered.

Counter-apologetics

This fallacy doesn't need much explaining: the theory of evolution does not state that a crocodile has to become a duck, or vice-versa, or that such a thing must have happened for evolution to be correct. Even if a duck were supposed to have evolved directly into a crocodile, nothing says that a duck would have a crocodile head aside from the Photoshopped picture at right.

The Crocoduck fallacy demonstrates the complete lack of understanding of Comfort and Cameron regarding biological evolution. They apparently believe that Darwinian evolution requires a direct, single-step ancestor between every two species on the planet. In other words, there must have been not only a crocoduck, but also a croco-beaver and a beaver-duck predating the crocodile, beaver, and duck.

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox