Category talk:Cosmological arguments
From Iron Chariots Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(Forgot signature) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think that this category might be a sub-category of [[:Category:Anthropic arguments|Anthropic arguments]]. Basically, an anthropic argument is one that uses the order found in various types of "things" to prove that there must have been a God to organize it. A cosmological argument specifically says that the universe itself is so orderly that it must have been made by a God. Thus, cosmological arguments would be a special case of anthropic arguments. | I think that this category might be a sub-category of [[:Category:Anthropic arguments|Anthropic arguments]]. Basically, an anthropic argument is one that uses the order found in various types of "things" to prove that there must have been a God to organize it. A cosmological argument specifically says that the universe itself is so orderly that it must have been made by a God. Thus, cosmological arguments would be a special case of anthropic arguments. | ||
| − | I'm not entirely convinced that I'm right yet. Somebody please weigh in on whether this category should be moved. | + | I'm not entirely convinced that I'm right yet. Somebody please weigh in on whether this category should be moved. --[[User:Kazim|Kazim]] 15:37, 11 November 2006 (CST) |
Latest revision as of 16:37, 11 November 2006
I think that this category might be a sub-category of Anthropic arguments. Basically, an anthropic argument is one that uses the order found in various types of "things" to prove that there must have been a God to organize it. A cosmological argument specifically says that the universe itself is so orderly that it must have been made by a God. Thus, cosmological arguments would be a special case of anthropic arguments.
I'm not entirely convinced that I'm right yet. Somebody please weigh in on whether this category should be moved. --Kazim 15:37, 11 November 2006 (CST)
