Avoidance of hell

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Fleshed out differences with Pascal's wager.)
m (Appeal to emotion link)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
The threat of hell differs from [[Pascal's wager]] in several key respects:
 
The threat of hell differs from [[Pascal's wager]] in several key respects:
* Pascal's wager is an intellectual argument. The threat of hell is purely emotional.
+
* Pascal's wager is an intellectual argument. The threat of hell is purely [[Appeal to emotion|emotional]].
 
* With the threat of hell, hell is assumed to exist. Pascal's wager treats this as an unknown.
 
* With the threat of hell, hell is assumed to exist. Pascal's wager treats this as an unknown.
  
 
[[Category:Arguments for the existence of God]]
 
[[Category:Arguments for the existence of God]]

Revision as of 10:51, 30 July 2006


"If you don't believe in God, you'll go to hell after you die."

The threat of eternal damnation and torment is an ever-popular argument for belief in God. It is simply an argumentum ad baculum, even though the person making the argument does not claim to be the one to carry it out.

The threat of hell differs from Pascal's wager in several key respects:

  • Pascal's wager is an intellectual argument. The threat of hell is purely emotional.
  • With the threat of hell, hell is assumed to exist. Pascal's wager treats this as an unknown.
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox