Atheists believe that everything is an accident

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (phrasing tweaks - jt)
m (Formatted sections, and linked up some pages)
Line 1: Line 1:
Religious people like to say that atheists believe everything is an "accident". Typically, when the topics of [[abiogenesis]] or the [[Big Bang]] arise, the theist offers a [[false dichotomy]] between "purposeful [[intelligent design|design]]" and "purposeless accident".
+
==Overview==
 +
 
 +
[[Religion|Religious]] people like to say that [[atheist]]s believe everything is an "accident". Typically, when the topics of [[abiogenesis]] or the [[Big Bang]] arise, the [[theist]] offers a [[false dichotomy]] between "purposeful [[intelligent design|design]]" and "purposeless accident".
 +
 
 +
==Understanding the Use of "Accident"==
  
 
Using the word "accident" implies that the phenomenon in question otherwise shouldn't happen. Thus, if the atheist believes it was an accident, then the atheist is foolishly believing that an event that shouldn't have happened, in fact did. If that's the case, the atheist could be accused of having [[faith]], and thus, is a hypocrite.  
 
Using the word "accident" implies that the phenomenon in question otherwise shouldn't happen. Thus, if the atheist believes it was an accident, then the atheist is foolishly believing that an event that shouldn't have happened, in fact did. If that's the case, the atheist could be accused of having [[faith]], and thus, is a hypocrite.  
  
Those who bring up this dichotomy are omitting a third option - "expected outcome". While an "accident" would be by definition an incredibly 'improbable' event, an "expected outcome" would be by definition a 'highly' probably event.  That is, given a set of initial conditions, a particular outcome is to be reasonably and logically expected.  Some examples would be:
+
==The Third Option==
 +
 
 +
Those who bring up this dichotomy are omitting a third option - "'''expected outcome'''". While an "accident" would be by definition an '''incredibly improbable''' event, an "expected outcome" would be by definition a '''highly probably''' event.  That is, given a set of initial conditions, a particular outcome is to be reasonably and [[logic|logically]] expected.  Some examples would be:
  
 
* If there's a lot of moisture in the air, and it's below freezing, it's to be expected that it would snow, and it's not an accident.
 
* If there's a lot of moisture in the air, and it's below freezing, it's to be expected that it would snow, and it's not an accident.
 
* If there's open soil in an otherwise grassy field during the summer, it's to be expected that grass will start to grow in it, and it's not an accident.
 
* If there's open soil in an otherwise grassy field during the summer, it's to be expected that grass will start to grow in it, and it's not an accident.
  
 +
===Historical Example===
  
 
After the Big Bang, a series of stages of the development of the [[universe]] lead until the present day. None of these stages are "accidents", but are all "expected outcomes":
 
After the Big Bang, a series of stages of the development of the [[universe]] lead until the present day. None of these stages are "accidents", but are all "expected outcomes":

Revision as of 06:58, 23 February 2011

Contents

Overview

Religious people like to say that atheists believe everything is an "accident". Typically, when the topics of abiogenesis or the Big Bang arise, the theist offers a false dichotomy between "purposeful design" and "purposeless accident".

Understanding the Use of "Accident"

Using the word "accident" implies that the phenomenon in question otherwise shouldn't happen. Thus, if the atheist believes it was an accident, then the atheist is foolishly believing that an event that shouldn't have happened, in fact did. If that's the case, the atheist could be accused of having faith, and thus, is a hypocrite.

The Third Option

Those who bring up this dichotomy are omitting a third option - "expected outcome". While an "accident" would be by definition an incredibly improbable event, an "expected outcome" would be by definition a highly probably event. That is, given a set of initial conditions, a particular outcome is to be reasonably and logically expected. Some examples would be:

  • If there's a lot of moisture in the air, and it's below freezing, it's to be expected that it would snow, and it's not an accident.
  • If there's open soil in an otherwise grassy field during the summer, it's to be expected that grass will start to grow in it, and it's not an accident.

Historical Example

After the Big Bang, a series of stages of the development of the universe lead until the present day. None of these stages are "accidents", but are all "expected outcomes":

  • Right after the Big Bang, we had a lot of elementary particles, such as quarks, floating around, and it's to be expected that they'd cool until they form sub-atomic particles, such as protons, electrons and neutrons.
  • After the hot protons, electrons and neutrons continue to cool, it is to be expected that they'd combine into hydrogen.
  • After some time of hydrogen and helium floating around the universe, it is to be expected that they'd fall into gravity wells, compress and ignite into stars.
  • As the nuclear fusion of the stars continues, it is to be expected that the process would build heavier atoms, such as nitrogen, carbon, oxygen, which alongside hydrogen, form the set of organic elements that are the building blocks to organic compounds.
  • As the star uses up its nuclear fuel, it is to be expected that the star will either nova or supernova, spreading the heavier elements around as stellar dust.
  • After some time of dust floating around, it is to be expected that it would fall into gravity wells, compress, and form planets and planetoids.
  • Etc.


Each step is logical and entirely reasonable to accept as true, especially is the claim is supported by evidence.

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox