Argument from poor design

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(added suboptimal features list')
(2 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{stub}}
+
The Dysteleological argument, or argument from poor design, is an argument against the existence of [[God]] - specifically a creator God. (Dysteleogology meaning unintelligent.)
== Examples of poor design ==
+
  
We conclude that this argument efficiently proves the non-existence of God. If the natural world is perfect then God exists. If it is imperfect then the counter-argument- if it's bad design, it's a result of the Fall (Genesis 3:16 has God saying to Eve "I will increase your trouble in pregnancy")- leads to the unfalsifiability of ID theory.
+
The argument typically goes as follows:
 +
 
 +
# An [[omnipotent]], [[omniscient]] and [[omnibenevolent]] God would create organisms with an optimal design.
 +
# Organisms, especially humans, have features that are suboptimal.
 +
# Therefore, God either did not create these organisms or is not omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent.
 +
 
 +
The argument is usually not proposed as an actual argument, but as a weaker [[Reductio ad absurdum]] of the argument from design - the bedrock argument for the [[Intelligent design]] movement.
 +
 
 +
Some of the suboptimal features often touted includes:
 +
# The eye (including the human eye, as the retina is backwards -- among other imperfections).
 +
# The Laryngeal nerve (seen most spectacularly in the giraffe with a multiple metre detour to reach a displacement of mere centimetres).
 +
[[Category:Arguments]]

Revision as of 14:58, 21 September 2010

The Dysteleological argument, or argument from poor design, is an argument against the existence of God - specifically a creator God. (Dysteleogology meaning unintelligent.)

The argument typically goes as follows:

  1. An omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent God would create organisms with an optimal design.
  2. Organisms, especially humans, have features that are suboptimal.
  3. Therefore, God either did not create these organisms or is not omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent.

The argument is usually not proposed as an actual argument, but as a weaker Reductio ad absurdum of the argument from design - the bedrock argument for the Intelligent design movement.

Some of the suboptimal features often touted includes:

  1. The eye (including the human eye, as the retina is backwards -- among other imperfections).
  2. The Laryngeal nerve (seen most spectacularly in the giraffe with a multiple metre detour to reach a displacement of mere centimetres).
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox