Argument from poor design

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
{{stub}}
+
The Dysteleological argument, or argument from poor design, is an argument against the existence of [[God]] - specifically a creator God. (Dysteleogology meaning unintelligent.)
== Examples of poor design ==
+
  
We conclude that this argument efficiently proves the non-existence of God. If the natural world is perfect then God exists. If it is imperfect then the counter-argument- if it's bad design, it's a result of the Fall (Genesis 3:16 has God saying to Eve "I will increase your trouble in pregnancy")- leads to the unfalsifiability of ID theory.
+
The argument typically goes as follows:
 +
 
 +
# An [[omnipotent]], [[omniscient]] and [[omnibenevolent]] God would create organisms with an optimal design.
 +
# Organisms, especially humans, have features that are suboptimal.
 +
# Therefore, God either did not create these organisms or is not omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent.
 +
 
 +
The argument is usually not proposed as an actual argument, but as a weaker [[Reductio ad absurdum]] of the argument from design - the bedrock argument for the [Intelligent design]] movement.
 +
[[Category:Arguments]]

Revision as of 19:09, 15 July 2010

The Dysteleological argument, or argument from poor design, is an argument against the existence of God - specifically a creator God. (Dysteleogology meaning unintelligent.)

The argument typically goes as follows:

  1. An omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent God would create organisms with an optimal design.
  2. Organisms, especially humans, have features that are suboptimal.
  3. Therefore, God either did not create these organisms or is not omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent.

The argument is usually not proposed as an actual argument, but as a weaker Reductio ad absurdum of the argument from design - the bedrock argument for the [Intelligent design]] movement.

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox